Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33098992›Full record

ArticleAnnals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology2021

Assessment of structural chromosomal instability phenotypes as biomarkers of carboplatin response in triple negative breast cancer: the TNT trial.

O Sipos, H Tovey, J Quist, S Haider, S Nowinski, P Gazinska, S Kernaghan, C Toms, S Maguire, N Orr and 8 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00532727 (Triple Negative Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00532727 phase3unknown statusnot on this map

Triple Negative Trial: A Randomised Phase III Trial of Carboplatin Compared to Docetaxel for Patients With Metastatic or Recurrent Locally Advanced ER-, PR- and HER2- Breast Cancer.

TypeinterventionalSponsorInstitute of Cancer Research, United KingdomRan2008 to 2020Enrolled400ConditionsBreast CancerArmsCarboplatin, Docetaxel
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

O SiposBreast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
H ToveyClinical Trials and Statistics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
J QuistBreast Cancer Now Unit, King's College London Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, London, UK; School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, London, UK.
S HaiderBreast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
S NowinskiSchool of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, London, UK.
P GazinskaBreast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
S KernaghanClinical Trials and Statistics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
C TomsClinical Trials and Statistics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
S MaguirePatrick G Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.
N OrrPatrick G Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.
S C LinnDivision of Molecular Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
J OwenKing's Health Partners Cancer Biobank, London, UK.
C GillettKing's Health Partners Cancer Biobank, London, UK.
S E PinderSchool of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, London, UK.
J M BlissClinical Trials and Statistics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
A TuttBreast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; Breast Cancer Now Unit, King's College London Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, London, UK; School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, London, UK.
M C U CheangClinical Trials and Statistics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
A GrigoriadisBreast Cancer Now Unit, King's College London Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, London, UK; School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, London, UK. Electronic address: anita.grigoriadis@kcl.ac.uk.
Institute of Cancer Research · GBKing's College London · GBKings Health Partners · GBQueen's University Belfast · GBBreast Cancer Now · GBThe Netherlands Cancer Institute · NL

Funding

Cancer Research UK 28990Cancer Research UK 7741
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn the TNT trial of triple negative breast cancer (NCT00532727), germline BRCA1/2 mutations were present in 28% of carboplatin responders. We assessed quantitative measures of structural chromosomal instability (CIN) to identify a wider patient subgroup within TNT with preferential benefit from carboplatin over docetaxel. PATIENTS AND

methodsCopy number aberrations (CNAs) were established from 135 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded primary carcinomas using Illumina OmniExpress SNP-arrays. Seven published [allelic imbalanced CNA (AiCNA); allelic balanced CNA (AbCNA); copy number neutral loss of heterozygosity (CnLOH); number of telomeric allelic imbalances (NtAI); BRCA1-like status; percentage of genome altered (PGA); homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) scores] and two novel [Shannon diversity index (SI); high-level amplifications (HLAMP)] CIN-measurements were derived. HLAMP was defined based on the presence of at least one of the top 5% amplified cytobands located on 1q, 8q and 10p. Continuous CIN-measurements were divided into tertiles. All nine CIN-measurements were used to analyse objective response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS).

resultsPatients with tumours without HLAMP had a numerically higher ORR and significantly longer PFS in the carboplatin (C) than in the docetaxel (D) arm [56% (C) versus 29% (D), P

conclusionsPatients with tumours lacking HLAMP and demonstrating intermediate CIN-measurements formed a subgroup benefitting from carboplatin relative to docetaxel treatment within the TNT trial. This suggests a complex and paradoxical relationship between the extent of genomic instability in primary tumours and treatment response in the metastatic setting.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsTriple Negative Breast NeoplasmsBiomarkersCarboplatinChromosomal InstabilityHumansPhenotypeBiomarkersCarboplatinallelic imbalancecarboplatingenomic instabilitymetastatic triple negative breast cancer

Identifiers

PMID33098992
PMCPMC7784666
OpenAlexW3093984705

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.