Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33098495›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental geochemistry and health2021

Evaluation of copper tailing amendments through poultry waste and ammonium nitrate.

Ítalo L Montofré, Elizabeth J Lam, Yendery Ramírez, María E Gálvez

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental geochemistry and health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 53% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Ítalo L MontofréMining Business School, ENM, Universidad Católica del Norte, Antofagasta, Chile. imontofre@ucn.cl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9201-8002
Elizabeth J LamChemical Engineering Department, Universidad Católica del Norte, Antofagasta, Chile.
Yendery RamírezChemical Engineering Department, Universidad Católica del Norte, Antofagasta, Chile.
María E GálvezChemical Engineering Department, Universidad Católica del Norte, Antofagasta, Chile.
Universidad Católica del Norte · CL

Funding

CORFO-INNOVA 08CM01-05
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, two amendments, poultry waste and ammonium nitrate, were evaluated to condition and stabilize a mine tailing and thus help the vegetation cover settle. Individually, ammonium nitrate was tested as a nitrogen source and chicken bone ash as a phosphate source. For this, laboratory tests were made on soil columns from the area to be remediated. The mobility and availability of metals and nutrients were determined by analyzing their leachates chemically. The results showed that the use of chicken bone ash decreases soluble metal concentrations, particularly in Fe and soluble Mn. On the other hand, experimental conditions proved that the acidification produced by ammonium nitrate nitrification does not significantly increase the lechate metal content. Therefore, its use for fertilization does not involve phytotoxicity risks. Regarding the availability of macronutrients as well as trace elements, the results showed that the concentrations lie within the ranges suitable for plant nutrition. So, the treatments are effective both for fertilization and phytoremediation.

Indexed as

CopperMiningPoultryAnimalsBiodegradation, EnvironmentalChileEnvironmental Restoration and RemediationFertilizersMetalsNitratesNitrogenSoilSoil PollutantsWaste Productsammonium nitrateCopperFertilizersMetalsNitratesNitrogenSoilSoil PollutantsWaste ProductsCopper mine tailingHeavy metal contaminationMining environmental liabilitiesPoultry wasteResidue amendment

Identifiers

PMID33098495
OpenAlexW3094425723

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.