Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33098420›Full record

ReviewJournal of animal science2020

Induced pluripotent stem cells from farm animals.

Yue Su, Jiaqi Zhu, Saleh Salman, Young Tang

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of animal science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Developing stem cell-based bovine embryos for in vitro breeding.The Journal of reproduction and development · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Bovine Pluripotent Stem Cells: Current Status and Prospects.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Transgenesis and Genome Engineering: A Historical Review.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023
    Article
  14. Review
  15. World journal of stem cells · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Historical DNA Manipulation Overview.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yue SuDepartment of Animal Science, Institute for Systems Genomics, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT.
Jiaqi ZhuDepartment of Animal Science, Institute for Systems Genomics, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT.
Saleh SalmanDepartment of Animal Science, Institute for Systems Genomics, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT.
Young TangDepartment of Animal Science, Institute for Systems Genomics, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT.
University of Connecticut · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of the induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) technology has revolutionized the world on the establishment of pluripotent stem cells (PSCs) across a great variety of animal species. Generation of iPSCs from domesticated animals would provide unrestricted cell resources for the study of embryonic development and cell differentiation of these species, for screening and establishing desired traits for sustainable agricultural production, and as veterinary and preclinical therapeutic tools for animal and human diseases. Induced PSCs from domesticated animals thus harbor enormous scientific, economical, and societal values. Although much progress has been made toward the generation of PSCs from these species, major obstacles remain precluding the exclamation of the establishment of bona fide iPSCs. The most prominent of them remain the inability of these cells to silence exogenous reprogramming factors, the obvious reliance on exogenous factors for their self-renewal, and the restricted development potential in vivo. In this review, we summarize the history and current progress in domestic farm animal iPSC generation, with a focus on swine, ruminants (cattle, ovine, and caprine), horses, and avian species (quails and chickens). We also discuss the problems associated with the farm animal iPSCs and potential future directions toward the complete reprogramming of somatic cells from farm animals.

Indexed as

Induced Pluripotent Stem CellsPluripotent Stem CellsAnimalsAnimals, DomesticCattleCell DifferentiationCellular ReprogrammingChickensGoatsHorsesSheepSwineaviandifferentiationinduced pluripotent stem cellslivestockpluripotencyreprogramming

Identifiers

PMID33098420
PMCPMC7660146
OpenAlexW3094088066

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.