Trial reportThe oncologist2021
Phase II Trial of Neoadjuvant Carboplatin and Nab-Paclitaxel in Patients with Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.
Trial report in The oncologist, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01525966 (Phase II Trial of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy With Carboplatin and NAB-Paclitaxel in Patients With Locally Advanced and Inflammatory Triple Negative Breast Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Phase II Trial of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy With Carboplatin and NAB-Paclitaxel in Patients With Locally Advanced and Inflammatory Triple Negative Breast Cancer
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.
- A systematic review and meta-analysis of BRCA1/2 mutation for predicting the effect of platinum-based chemotherapy in triple-negative breast cancer.Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland) · 2022Pooled it
- Safety and preliminary efficacy of adding tocilizumab to cisplatin/docetaxel for the treatment of locally advanced triple-negative breast cancer patients: prospective phase 1/2 clinical trial.Scientific reports · 2026Trial
- Pathological Complete Response to Nab-Paclitaxel-Containing Neoadjuvant Regimens in Early Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Non-BRCA germline pathogenic variants and response to neoadjuvant systemic therapy in triple-negative breast cancer patients enrolled in a prospective clinical trial.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2026Article
- Role of tumor‑infiltrating lymphocytes and miR‑155 in breast cancer: Insights into carcinogenesis and their potential as prognostic biomarkers (Review).Oncology reports · 2026Review
- Homologous recombination pathway alterations in basal-like breast cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Retrospective analysis of the clinical efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy albumin paclitaxel combined with carboplatin in the treatment of triple-negative breast cancer.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Therapeutic Potential of Metal-Based and PARP Inhibitor Chemotherapy forInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Innovative approaches in breast cancer therapy: repurposing nanocarriers for enhanced outcomes.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2025Review
- Efficacy and safety of platinum-based, anthracycline-free neoadjuvant chemotherapy for triple-negative breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Predictive value of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes for neoadjuvant therapy response in triple-negative breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.World journal of clinical oncology · 2024Article
- Evolving Management of Breast Cancer in the Era of Predictive Biomarkers and Precision Medicine.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024Review
- Metastatic adult Wilms' tumor managed by chemotherapy, immunotherapy and target therapy: a case report.Future science OA · 2024Article
- Review
- Immunogenicity and efficacy of pembrolizumab and doxorubicin in a phase I trial for patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer.Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII · 2023Article
- Development and validation of a prognostic model for HER2-low breast cancer to evaluate neoadjuvant therapy.Gland surgery · 2023Article
- Predictive Biomarkers for Response to Immunotherapy in Triple Negative Breast Cancer: Promises and Challenges.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- 'ADVANCE' (a pilot trial) ADjuVANt chemotherapy in the elderly: Developing and evaluating lower-toxicity chemotherapy options for older patients with breast cancer.Journal of geriatric oncology · 2023Article
- Therapeutic potential of human serum albumin nanoparticles encapsulated actinonin in murine model of lung adenocarcinoma.Drug delivery · 2022Article
- Efficacy of different neoadjuvant treatment regimens in BRCA-mutated triple negative breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Hereditary cancer in clinical practice · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIn this phase II clinical trial, we evaluated the efficacy of the nonanthracycline combination of carboplatin and nab-paclitaxel in early stage triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). PATIENTS AND
methodsPatients with newly diagnosed stage II-III TNBC (n = 69) were treated with neoadjuvant carboplatin (area under the curve 6) every 28 days for four cycles plus nab-paclitaxel (100 mg/m
resultsSixty-seven patients were evaluable for safety and response. Fifty-three (79%) patients experienced grade 3/4 adverse events, including grade 3 anemia (43%), neutropenia (39%), leukopenia (15%), thrombocytopenia (12%), fatigue (7%), peripheral neuropathy (7%), neutropenia (16%), and leukopenia (1%). Twenty-four patients (35%) had at least one dose delay, and 50 patients (72%) required dose reduction. Sixty-three (94%) patients completed scheduled treatment. The responses were as follows: 32 of 67 patients (48%) had pCR (RCB 0), 10 of 67 (15%) had RCB I, 19 of 67 (28%) had RCB II, 5 of 67 (7%) had RCB III, and 1 of 67 (2%) progressed and had no surgery. Univariate analysis showed that immune-hot GSIS and DNA repair defect (DRD) were associated with higher pCR with odds ratios of 4.62 (p = .005) and 4.76 (p = .03), respectively, and with RCB 0/I versus RCB II/III with odds ratio 4.80 (p = .01). Immune-hot GSIS was highly correlated with DRD status (p = .03), TIL level (p < .001), and TNBC molecular subtype (p < .001). After adjusting for age, race, stage, and grade, GSIS remained associated with higher pCR and RCB class 0/I versus II/III with odds ratios 7.19 (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.01-25.68; p = .002) and 8.95 (95% CI, 2.09-38.23; p = .003), respectively.
conclusionThe combination of carboplatin and nab-paclitaxel for early stage high-risk TNBC showed manageable toxicity and encouraging antitumor activity. Immune-hot GSIS is associated with higher pCR rate and RCB class 0/1. This study provides an additional rationale for using nonanthracycline platinum-based therapy for future neoadjuvant trials in early stage TNBCs. Clinical trial identification number: NCT01525966 IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Platinum is an important neoadjuvant chemotherapy agent for treatment of early stage triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). In this study, carboplatin and nab-paclitaxel were well tolerated and highly effective in TNBC, resulting in pathological complete response of 48%. In univariate and multivariate analyses adjusting for age, race, tumor stage and grade, "immune-hot" GeparSixto immune signature (GSIS) and DNA repair defect (DRD) were associated with higher pathological complete response (pCR) and residual cancer burden class 0/1. The association of immune-hot GSIS with higher pCR holds promise for de-escalating neoadjuvant chemotherapy for patients with early stage TNBC. Although GSIS is not routinely used in clinic, further development of this immune signature into a clinically applicable assay is indicated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.