Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33098189›Full record

Trial reportThe oncologist2021

Do Patients Regret Having Received Systemic Treatment for Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Prospective Evaluation.

Patricia J Hollen, Richard J Gralla, Ryan D Gentzler, Richard D Hall, Bethany Coyne, Haiying Cheng, Balazs Halmos, Jane Gildersleeve, Claudia Calderon, Ivora Hinton and 4 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The oncologist, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Patricia J HollenUniversity of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.
Richard J GrallaAlbert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7963-3086
Ryan D GentzlerUniversity of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.
Richard D HallUniversity of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.
Bethany CoyneUniversity of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.
Haiying ChengAlbert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA.
Balazs HalmosAlbert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA.
Jane GildersleeveUniversity of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.
Claudia CalderonAlbert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA.
Ivora HintonUniversity of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.
Geoffrey WeissUniversity of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.
Jeffrey CrawfordDuke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Jane CeriseFeinstein Institute for Medical Research, Manhasset, New York, USA.
Martin LesserFeinstein Institute for Medical Research, Manhasset, New York, USA.
University of Virginia · USAlbert Einstein College of Medicine · USFeinstein Institute for Medical Research · USDuke University · US

Funding

A Decision Aid with HRQL Assessment to Reduce Costs in the Treatment of NSCLCR01CA157409 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI GRALLA, RICHARD G, HOLLEN, PATRICIA JEAN · 2012 to 2014
$1.9M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA157409
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThousands of patients annually receive treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but little is known about their views on the decision to receive that treatment, or regret. This trial prospectively evaluated the incidence of regret and whether baseline characteristics, patient decision-making parameters, or clinical progress early in the treatment course predicts regret. MATERIALS AND

methodsPatients receiving systemic treatment for advanced NSCLC completed every 3-week patient reported outcome (PRO) assessment using the electronic Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (eLCSS-QL), including the 3-Item Global Index (3-IGI; assessing overall distress, activities, and quality of life [QL]). A prespecified secondary aim was to determine the frequency of regret evaluated at 3 months after starting treatment. Patients were randomized to usual care or enhanced care (which included use of the DecisionKEYS decision aid).

resultsOf 164 patients entered, 160 received treatment and 142 were evaluable for regret. In total, 11.5% of patients and 9% of their supporters expressed regret. Baseline characteristics did not predict regret; regret was rarely expressed by those who had a less than 20% decline or improvement in the 3-IGI PRO score after two treatment cycles. In contrast, when asked if they would make the same decision again, only 1% not having a 20% 3-IGI decline expressed regret, versus 14% with a 3-IGI decline (p = .01).

conclusionThe majority of patients having regret were identified early using the PRO 3-IGI of the eLCSS-QL measure. Identifying patients at risk for regret allows for interventions, including frank discussions of progress and goals early in the treatment course, which could address regret in patients and their supporters. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: This report documents prospectively, for the first time, the incidence of treatment-related regret in patients with advanced lung cancer and outlines that risk of regret is associated with patient-determined worsening health status early in the course of treatment. Identifying patients at risk for regret early in treatment (before the third cycle of treatment) appears to be crucial. Counseling at that time should include a discussion of consideration of treatment change and the reason for this change.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungLung NeoplasmsDecision MakingEmotionsHumansProspective StudiesQuality of LifeDecision aidNon-small cell lung cancerPatient-reported outcomesQuality of lifeRegret

Identifiers

PMID33098189
PMCPMC7930410
OpenAlexW3093550433

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.