Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33098180›Full record

SynthesisHead & neck2021

Systematic review of postoperative therapy for resected squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: Executive summary of the American Radium Society appropriate use criteria.

Danielle N Margalit, Assuntina G Sacco, Jay S Cooper, John A Ridge, Richard L Bakst, Beth M Beadle, Jonathan J Beitler, Steven S Chang, Allen M Chen, Tom J Galloway and 7 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Head & neck, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Danielle N MargalitDana-Farber/Brigham & Women's Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8281-0829
Assuntina G SaccoUniversity of California, San Diego, California, USA.
Jay S CooperAlbert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA.
John A RidgeFox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Richard L BakstMount Sinai Icahn School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA.
Beth M BeadleStanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
Jonathan J BeitlerEmory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Steven S ChangHenry Ford Cancer Institute, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
Allen M ChenUniversity of California, Irvine, California, USA.
Tom J GallowayFox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5730-2099
Shlomo A KoyfmanCleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Carol MitaCountway Library, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Jared R RobbinsUniversity of Arizona Cancer Center, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.
C Jillian TsaiMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0400-2655
Minh T TruongBoston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Sue S YomUniversity of California, San Francisco, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0779-7476
Farzan SiddiquiHenry Ford Cancer Institute, Detroit, Michigan, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aims of this systematic review are to (a) evaluate the current literature on the impact of postoperative therapy for resected squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) on oncologic and non-oncologic outcomes and (b) identify the optimal evidence-based postoperative therapy recommendations for commonly encountered clinical scenarios.

methodsAn analysis of the medical literature from peer-reviewed journals was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guideline. Prospective studies and methodology-based systematic reviews and meta-analyses of postoperative therapy for SCCHN were identified by searching Medline (OVID) and EMBASE (Elsevier) using controlled vocabulary terms (ie, National Library of Medicine Medical Subject Headings [MeSH], EMTREE). Study screening and selection was performed with Covidence software and full-text review. The RAND/UCLA appropriateness method was used by the expert panel to rate the appropriate use of postoperative therapy, and the modified Delphi method was used to come to consensus.

resultsA total of 5660 studies were identified and screened using the title and abstract, leading to 201 studies assessed for relevance using full-text review. After limitation to the eligibility criteria, 101 studies from 1977 to 2020 were identified, including 77 with oncologic endpoints and 24 with function and quality of life endpoints. All studies reported staging prior to the implementation of American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC-8).

conclusionsProspective clinical studies and systematic reviews identified through the PRISMA systematic review provided good evidence for consensus statements regarding the appropriate use of postoperative therapy for resected SCCHN. Further research is needed in domains where consensus by the expert panel could not be achieved for the appropriateness of specific postoperative therapeutic interventions.

Indexed as

Head and Neck NeoplasmsRadiumHumansProspective StudiesQuality of LifeSquamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and NeckUnited StatesRadiumadjuvant therapyappropriate useguidelineshead and neck cancerpostoperative

Identifiers

PMID33098180
PMCPMC7756212

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.