Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33098079›Full record

ArticleAging clinical and experimental research2021

Detecting subtle mobility changes among older adults: the Quantitative Timed Up and Go test.

Erin Smith, Caitriona Cunningham, Barry R Greene, Ulrik McCarthy Persson, Catherine Blake

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Aging clinical and experimental research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Erin SmithHealth Service Executive, Physiotherapy Department, Louth PCS, Dundalk, Ireland.
Caitriona CunninghamSchool of Public Health, Physiotherapy and Sports Science, University College Dublin, Health Sciences, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland. caitriona.g.cunningham@ucd.ie.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8916-9499
Barry R GreeneKinesis Health Technologies, Nexus UCD, Belfield Office Park, Clonskeagh, Dublin 4, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4445-9609
Ulrik McCarthy PerssonSchool of Public Health, Physiotherapy and Sports Science, University College Dublin, Health Sciences, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5673-405X
Catherine BlakeSchool of Public Health, Physiotherapy and Sports Science, University College Dublin, Health Sciences, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0600-629X
University College Dublin · IEKinesis Health Technologies (Ireland) · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Quantitative Timed Up and Go (QTUG) test uses wearable sensors, containing a triaxial accelerometer and an add-on triaxial gyroscope, to quantify performance during the TUG test with potential to capture more minor changes in mobility.

aimsTo examine the responsiveness, minimum detectable change (MDC) and observed effect size of QTUG in a cohort of socially active adults aged 50 years and over participating in a structured community exercise program.

methods54 participants (91% females, mean age 63.6 ± 6.5 years) completed repeated QTUG testing under single- and dual-task conditions. Responsiveness of the QTUG was assessed by correlation of change in standard TUG with QTUG change (Pearson's correlation coefficient). MDC and effect sizes (standardized mean difference and Cohen's d) were also calculated for QTUG.

resultsThere was a strong positive correlation between change in the standard TUG and change in QTUG (single task r = 0.91, p < 0.001). MDC in QTUG was calculated as 0.77 (Sd, 1.39; ICC 0.96) seconds (single task) and 2.33 (Sd 2.18; ICC 0.85) seconds (dual task). Several QTUG parameters showed improvements in mean values with small effect sizes (sit -to-stand transition time d = 0.418; walk time d = 0.398; cadence d = 0.306, swing time d = 0.314; step time d = 0.479; gait velocity d = 0.365; time to reach turn d = 0.322) under single-task conditions and with a moderate effect size (d = 0.549) in time taken to turn under the dual-task condition.

conclusionInitial evidence of QTUG's responsiveness to change in mobility in active middle to older age adults has been demonstrated with small to moderate effect sizes observed in specific QTUG parameters.

Indexed as

Postural BalanceWalkingAgedFemaleGaitHumansMaleMiddle AgedPhysical Therapy ModalitiesTime and Motion StudiesAgingExerciseMinimal detectable changeOsteoporosisQTUGResponsiveness

Identifiers

PMID33098079
OpenAlexW3094042147

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.