Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33098045›Full record

ReviewAesthetic plastic surgery2021

Umbilical Reconstruction Techniques: A Literature Review.

Andrea Sisti, Maria T Huayllani, Daniel Boczar, David J Restrepo, Gabriela Cinotto, Xiaona Lu, Roberto Cuomo, Luca Grimaldi, Giuseppe Nisi, Antonio J Forte

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Enhancing patient education in breast surgery: artificial intelligence-powered guidance for mastopexy, augmentation, reduction, and reconstruction.Translational breast cancer research : a journal focusing on translational research in breast cancer · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Andrea SistiDivision of Plastic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6634-5613
Maria T HuayllaniDivision of Plastic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 4500 San Pablo Road, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
Daniel BoczarHansjörg Wyss Department of Plastic Surgery, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA.
David J RestrepoUniversity of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio (UTHSCSA) General Surgery, San Antonio, TX, USA.
Gabriela CinottoDivision of Plastic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 4500 San Pablo Road, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
Xiaona LuDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Roberto CuomoDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Santa Maria alle Scotte Hospital, University of Siena, Siena, Italy.
Luca GrimaldiDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Santa Maria alle Scotte Hospital, University of Siena, Siena, Italy.
Giuseppe NisiDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Santa Maria alle Scotte Hospital, University of Siena, Siena, Italy.
Antonio J ForteDivision of Plastic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 4500 San Pablo Road, Jacksonville, FL, USA. ajvforte@yahoo.com.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2004-7538

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere are many instances in which sacrificing the umbilicus is unavoidable. Umbilical reconstruction (umbiliconeoplasty) is an important surgical procedure to complete the abdomen's reconstruction and to give again a pleasant cosmetic appearance.

objectivesTo provide a complete overview of all surgical techniques for umbiliconeoplasty described in the literature.

methodsPubMed database was queried using 'umbilical and reconstruction', 'umbilicus and reconstruction', 'navel and reconstruction', 'umbiliconeoplasty', 'neo-omphaloplasty' or 'umbilicaneoplasty' to select the papers dealing with the reconstruction of the umbilicus.

resultsSixty different techniques for the reconstruction of the missing umbilicus were described in 77 papers. Local skin flaps and the purse-string suture technique were the most frequently described techniques. The Three flaps technique, the Four flaps technique and the 2 Lateral rectangular pedicle lateral flaps technique were the most popular local flap techniques. Indications ranged from congenital pediatric defects to reconstruction during abdominoplasty.

conclusionsSeveral surgical techniques were described for umbilicus reconstruction. While there is not a universal algorithm for the choice of the technique, the surgeon may decide which technique to use based on other surgeons' experiences reports. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Indexed as

AbdominoplastyUmbilicusChildHumansSurgical FlapsSuture TechniquesTreatment OutcomeNeo-omphaloplastyNeoumbilicoplastyUmbilical reconstructionUmbiliconeoplasty

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.