Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33098020›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of applied physiology2021

The acute physiological and perceptual effects of recovery interval intensity during cycling-based high-intensity interval training.

Christopher R J Fennell, James G Hopker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of applied physiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Christopher R J FennellSchool of Sport and Exercise Sciences, University of Kent at Medway, Medway Building, Kent, Chatham, ME4 4AG, England, UK.
James G HopkerSchool of Sport and Exercise Sciences, University of Kent at Medway, Medway Building, Kent, Chatham, ME4 4AG, England, UK. J.G.Hopker@kent.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4786-7037

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe current study sought to investigate the role of recovery intensity on the physiological and perceptual responses during cycling-based aerobic high-intensity interval training.

methodsFourteen well-trained cyclists ([Formula: see text]: 62 ± 9 mL kg

resultsThe time spent at > 80%, > 90% and > 95% of maximal minute power during the work intervals was significantly increased with PA recovery, when compared to both 80A and 110A, during both HIIT protocols (all P ≤ 0.001). However, recovery intensity had no effect on the time spent at > 90% [Formula: see text] (P = 0.11) or > 95% [Formula: see text] (P = 0.50) during the work intervals of both HIIT protocols. Session RPE was significantly higher following the 110A recovery, when compared to the PA and 80A recovery during both HIIT protocols (P < 0.001).

conclusionPassive recovery facilitates a higher work interval PO and similar internal stress for a lower sRPE when compared to active recovery and therefore may be the efficacious recovery intensity prescription.

Indexed as

AdultBicyclingExercise TestFemaleHeart RateHigh-Intensity Interval TrainingHumansLactic AcidMaleOxygen ConsumptionLactic AcidHigh-intensity interval trainingNear-infrared spectroscopyRecovery componentsRecovery interval intensity

Identifiers

PMID33098020
PMCPMC7862540

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.