Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33098009›Full record

ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2021

Comparative study of 3D printed navigation template-assisted atlantoaxial pedicle screws versus free-hand screws for type II odontoid fractures.

Yang Li, Jing Lin, Yuan Wang, Haotian Luo, Jing Wang, Sheng Lu, Yongqing Xu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Clinical applications of 3D printing in spine surgery: a systematic review.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. 3D printing in spine care: A review of current applications.Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yang LiDepartment of Orthopedics, The 920th Hospital of Joint Logistic Support Force of PLA, Kunming, 650032, China.
Jing LinDepartment of Neurosurgery, The 452 Hospital of Western Air Force, Chengdu, 610021, China.
Yuan WangSecond Department of Spine Surgery, Changzheng Hospital, The Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, 20003, China.
Haotian LuoDepartment of Orthopedics, The 920th Hospital of Joint Logistic Support Force of PLA, Kunming, 650032, China.
Jing WangDepartment of Orthopedics, The 920th Hospital of Joint Logistic Support Force of PLA, Kunming, 650032, China.
Sheng LuDepartment of Orthopedics, The 920th Hospital of Joint Logistic Support Force of PLA, Kunming, 650032, China.
Yongqing XuDepartment of Orthopedics, The 920th Hospital of Joint Logistic Support Force of PLA, Kunming, 650032, China. xuyongqingkm@163.net.
Second Military Medical University · CN

Funding

Major Military Science Research AWS17J004National Natural Science Foundation 81772367
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe objective of the study was to compare the safety, efficacy, and accuracy of the pedicle screws with the three-dimensional (3D) printed navigation template to the free-hand screws for type II odontoid fractures. PATIENTS AND

methodsA total of 60 patients with type II odontoid fractures, treated with either template guiding pedicle screws or free-hand screws, were retrospectively assessed. The guiding group was treated with pedicle screws with the assistance of a virtual reality (VR) software-designed, 3D printed navigation template with two guide tubes. The safety rate and treatment efficacy of the screw placement, as well as the trajectory accuracy, were evaluated by respective measures and compared between two surgical groups.

resultsThere were reduced surgical time (P < 0.05), blood loss (P < 0.01), and C-arm shots (P < 0.01) with 3D printed template guiding screws. The rates of safe pedicle screws in both C1 and C2 were significantly higher in 3D guiding group (P < 0.01) compared to the free-hand group, and the scores of visual analogue scale (VAS) and impairment scale (ASIA) were improved in guiding group at 1 week post-surgery (P < 0.01 and P < 0.05, respectively). Postoperative CT and image reconstruction showed the 3D guiding group had better horizontal screw accuracy on both sides of C1 (L: P < 0.001, R: P < 0.01) and C2 (L: P < 0.001, R: P < 0.01) than free-hand group.

conclusionThe herein screw technique using 3D printed navigation template leads to greater improvement in the screw safety, efficacy, and accuracy, which may be a promising alternative to free-hand surgery for the treatment of odontoid fractures.

Indexed as

Fractures, BoneOdontoid ProcessPedicle ScrewsSurgery, Computer-AssistedHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalPrinting, Three-DimensionalRetrospective Studies3D printingAtlantoaxial pedicle screwNavigation templateOdontoid fracturesVirtual reality

Identifiers

PMID33098009
OpenAlexW3093784644

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.