ArticleBritish dental journal2020
Incidence of new carious lesions and tooth loss in head and neck cancer patients: a retrospective case series from a single unit.
Article in British dental journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06308796 (Prevention of Caries in Head and Neck Cancer Survivors Who Underwent Radiotherapy), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Prevention of Caries in Head and Neck Cancer Survivors Who Underwent Radiotherapy: a Randomized Controlled Trial
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Preventive and restorative alternatives to caries by irradiation: a scoping review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024Article
- Ionizing radiation effects on osseointegration: a pre-clinical study.Brazilian oral research · 2024Article
- Tooth Failure Post-Radiotherapy in Head and Neck Cancer: Primary Report of the Clinical Registry of Dental Outcomes in Head and Neck Cancer Patients (OraRad) Study.International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2022Article
- Impact of non-compliance with oral care on radiation caries in head and neck cancer survivors.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021Article
- Acute Radiation Syndrome and the Microbiome: Impact and Review.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Radiation-induced xerostomia can result in increased caries incidence, necessitating more dental extractions and a resultant increased risk of debilitating osteoradionecrosis (ORN). Patients undergoing head and neck radiotherapy are routinely treated with a topical preventative regime consisting of fluoride and CPP-ACP (Tooth Mousse). There is limited evidence specifically relating to fluoride prevention regimes in head and neck cancer patients. Other novel remineralising aids using calcium and phosphate have been proposed for use in head and neck cancer patients, but again, there is limited evidence.Aims To retrospectively analyse head and neck cancer patients treated with radiotherapy and placed on a fluoride/CPP-ACP prevention regime at a single institution. To assess the incidence of caries, extractions and ORN.Materials and methods Case records for 95 patients were retrospectively assessed. This involved review of paper and computerised clinical notes, correspondence letters and radiographs.Results The mean number of carious teeth was 6.63 (SD 6.81) and the mean number of extractions was 4.88 (SD 5.84). The teeth most frequently affected by caries and extractions were the mandibular incisors, and 28.4% of patients developed ORN (81.5% of cases occurring in the mandible).Conclusion Development of caries and extraction was a very common event. There is a need for further research into the efficacy of topical prevention regimes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.