Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33097671›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2020

Improving the taxonomy of fossil pollen using convolutional neural networks and superresolution microscopy.

Ingrid C Romero, Shu Kong, Charless C Fowlkes, Carlos Jaramillo, Michael A Urban, Francisca Oboh-Ikuenobe, Carlos D'Apolito, Surangi W Punyasena

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Barremian tricolpate pollen from Portugal-New evidence for the age of eudicot-related angiosperms.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ingrid C RomeroDepartment of Plant Biology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801; romerov2@illinois.edu spunya1@illinois.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-1376-5830
Shu KongRobotics Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213.ORCID 0000-0002-1362-5937
Charless C FowlkesDepartment of Computer Science, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697.ORCID 0000-0002-2990-1780
Carlos JaramilloCenter for Tropical Paleoecology and Archaeology, Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Ancon, 0843-03092, Panama.ORCID 0000-0002-2616-5079
Michael A UrbanDepartment of Plant Biology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801.
Francisca Oboh-IkuenobeDepartment of Geosciences and Geological and Petroleum Engineering, Missouri University of Science and Technology, Rolla, MO 65409.ORCID 0000-0002-2223-9691
Carlos D'ApolitoFaculdade de Geociencias, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso, Cuiaba, 78000, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-1602-0201
Surangi W PunyasenaDepartment of Plant Biology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801; romerov2@illinois.edu spunya1@illinois.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-2110-5840

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Taxonomic resolution is a major challenge in palynology, largely limiting the ecological and evolutionary interpretations possible with deep-time fossil pollen data. We present an approach for fossil pollen analysis that uses optical superresolution microscopy and machine learning to create a quantitative and higher throughput workflow for producing palynological identifications and hypotheses of biological affinity. We developed three convolutional neural network (CNN) classification models: maximum projection (MPM), multislice (MSM), and fused (FM). We trained the models on the pollen of 16 genera of the legume tribe Amherstieae, and then used these models to constrain the biological classifications of 48 fossil

Indexed as

FossilsNeural Networks, ComputerPhylogenyAfricaAfrica, WesternMachine LearningMicroscopyPhylogeographyPollenSouth AmericaAiryscan microscopyautomated classificationDetarioideaemachine learningpalynology

Identifiers

PMID33097671
PMCPMC7668113

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.