Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33097651›Full record

ArticleESMO open2020

Responsiveness to immune checkpoint inhibitors versus other systemic therapies in RET-aberrant malignancies.

Aparna Hegde, Alexander Y Andreev-Drakhlin, Jason Roszik, Le Huang, Shuang Liu, Kenneth Hess, Maria Cabanillas, Mimi I Hu, Naifa L Busaidy, Steven I Sherman and 12 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase I
In one paragraph

Article in ESMO open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Selpercatinib in Patients WithJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2023
    Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Aparna HegdeDepartment of Hematology Oncology, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.
Alexander Y Andreev-DrakhlinDepartment of Hematology Oncology, UTMDACC, Houston, Texas, USA.
Jason RoszikDepartment of Melanoma Medical Oncology, UTMDACC, Houston, Texas, USA.
Le HuangDepartment of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, UTMDACC, Houston, Texas, USA.
Shuang LiuDepartment of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, UTMDACC, Houston, Texas, USA.
Kenneth HessDepartment of Biostatistics, UTMDACC, Houston, Texas, USA.
Maria CabanillasDepartment of Endocrine Neoplasia and Hormonal Disorders, UTMDACC, Houston, Texas, USA.
Mimi I HuDepartment of Endocrine Neoplasia and Hormonal Disorders, UTMDACC, Houston, Texas, USA.
Naifa L BusaidyDepartment of Endocrine Neoplasia and Hormonal Disorders, UTMDACC, Houston, Texas, USA.
Steven I ShermanDepartment of Endocrine Neoplasia and Hormonal Disorders, UTMDACC, Houston, Texas, USA.
Ramona DaduDepartment of Endocrine Neoplasia and Hormonal Disorders, UTMDACC, Houston, Texas, USA.
Elizabeth G GrubbsDepartment of Surgical Oncology, UTMDACC, Houston, Texas, USA.
Siraj M AliDepartment of Clinical Development, Foundation Medicine Inc, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Jessica LeeDepartment of Clinical Development, Foundation Medicine Inc, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Yasir Y ElaminDepartment of Thoracic Head and Neck Medical Oncology, UTMDACC, Houston, Texas, USA.
George R SimonDepartment of Thoracic Head and Neck Medical Oncology, UTMDACC, Houston, Texas, USA.
George R BlumenscheinDepartment of Thoracic Head and Neck Medical Oncology, UTMDACC, Houston, Texas, USA.
Vassiliki A PapadimitrakopoulouDepartment of Thoracic Head and Neck Medical Oncology, UTMDACC, Houston, Texas, USA.
David HongDepartment of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, UTMDACC, Houston, Texas, USA.
Funda Meric-BernstamDepartment of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, UTMDACC, Houston, Texas, USA.
John HeymachDepartment of Thoracic Head and Neck Medical Oncology, UTMDACC, Houston, Texas, USA.
Vivek SubbiahDepartment of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, UTMDACC, Houston, Texas, USA. Electronic address: vsubbiah@mdanderson.org.
Foundation Medicine (United States)The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · US

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Fabien Delerue · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
Convalescent Plasma to Limit Coronavirus Associated ComplicationsUL1TR003167 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI KARP, DANIEL D, MCPHERSON, DAVID D · 2019 to 2023
$45.3M
TRAINING FOR ACADEMIC ONCOLOGY/HEMATOLOGYT32CA009666 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Michael Davies, Courtney DiNardo · 1994 to 2026
$9.8M
Blocking tumor progression in therapy-responsive RET aberration-associated cancerR01CA242845 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA HLTH SCIENCES CTR · PI AHNERT, JORDI RODON, MOOERS, BLAINE H. M. · 2020 to 2024
$1.9M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR003167NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672NCI NIH HHS R01 CA242845NCI NIH HHS T32 CA009666
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe receptor tyrosine kinase rearranged during transfection (RET) can be oncogenically activated by gene fusions or point mutations. Multikinase inhibitors such as cabozantinib, lenvatinib and vandetanib have demonstrated activity in RET-dependent malignancies, and selective RET inhibitors (Selpercatinib and Pralsetinib) are in clinical trials. However, the responsiveness of RET-dependent malignancies to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is unknown. We compared the time to treatment discontinuation (TTD) for ICI versus non-ICI therapy in patients with malignancies harbouring activating RET mutations or fusions (RET+).

methodsA retrospective review of all RET+ patients who were referred to the phase I clinical trials programme at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center was conducted. TTD was estimated using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Multivariate analysis using the Cox proportional hazard model was performed to identify independent risk factors of treatment discontinuation.

resultsOf 70 patients who received systemic therapy for RET+ malignancies, 20 (28.6%) received ICI and 50 (71.4%) received non-ICI therapy. Non-ICI therapy was associated with decreased risk for treatment discontinuation compared with ICI in the overall population (HR=0.31; 95% CI 0.16-0.62; p=0.000834) and in patients with RET point mutations (HR=0.13; 95% CI 0.04-0.45; p=0.00134). In patients with RET fusions, non-ICI therapy was associated with a non-statistically significant decreased risk of treatment discontinuation (HR=0.59; 95% CI 0.25-1.4; p=0.24). ICI therapy and a diagnosis other than medullary thyroid cancer (MTC) were independent risk factors for treatment discontinuation.

conclusionOur study supports the prioritisation of non-ICI over ICI therapy in patients with RET+ tumours.

Indexed as

Immune Checkpoint InhibitorsThyroid NeoplasmsHumansProto-Oncogene Proteins c-retPyrazolesPyridinesPyrimidinesRetrospective StudiesImmune Checkpoint InhibitorspralsetinibProto-Oncogene Proteins c-retPyrazolesPyridinesPyrimidinesRET protein, humanselpercatinibimmunotherapymedullary thyroid cancernon-small cell lung cancerrearranged during transcription

Identifiers

PMID33097651
PMCPMC7590373
OpenAlexW3094579163

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.