ArticleBMC bioinformatics2020
A rank-based marker selection method for high throughput scRNA-seq data.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
35 citing papers in PubMed.
- RKMR: A Rapid Kernel Machine Regression Framework for Optimal Marker Detection in Spatial Omics Data.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Article
- RECOMBINE identifies recurrent composite markers of cell types and states.Genome research · 2026Article
- A transcriptomics-native foundation model for universal cell representation and virtual cell synthesis.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Scalable nonparametric clustering with unified marker gene selection for single-cell RNA-seq data.Cell reports methods · 2026Article
- CANTAO: guiding clustering and annotation in single-cell RNA sequencing using average overlap.Molecular systems biology · 2026Article
- Inference of marker genes of subtle cell state changes via iLR: iterative logistic regression.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- CORTADO: hill climbing optimization for cell-type specific marker gene discovery and clustering accuracy improvement.Bioinformatics advances · 2026Article
- Label-free selection of marker genes in single-cell and spatial transcriptomics with geneCover.Genome research · 2025Article
- Optimal marker genes forGenome research · 2025Article
- Scalable nonparametric clustering with unified marker gene selection for single-cell RNA-seq data.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Multi-view gene panel characterization for spatially resolved omics.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Article
- DropDAE: Denosing Autoencoder with Contrastive Learning for Addressing Dropout Events in scRNA-seq Data.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Homebuilt Imaging-Based Spatial Transcriptomics: Tertiary Lymphoid Structures as a Case Example.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025Article
- Hierarchical marker genes selection in scRNA-seq analysis.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
- Spatial transcriptomic brain imaging reveals the effects of immunomodulation therapy on specific regional brain cells in a mouse dementia model.BMC genomics · 2024Article
- A comparison of marker gene selection methods for single-cell RNA sequencing data.Genome biology · 2024Article
- MarkerMap: nonlinear marker selection for single-cell studies.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2024Article
- uPAR (PLAUR) Marks Two Intra-Tumoral Subtypes of Glioblastoma: Insights from Single-Cell RNA Sequencing.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Gene panel selection for targeted spatial transcriptomics.Genome biology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundHigh throughput microfluidic protocols in single cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) collect mRNA counts from up to one million individual cells in a single experiment; this enables high resolution studies of rare cell types and cell development pathways. Determining small sets of genetic markers that can identify specific cell populations is thus one of the major objectives of computational analysis of mRNA counts data. Many tools have been developed for marker selection on single cell data; most of them, however, are based on complex statistical models and handle the multi-class case in an ad-hoc manner.
resultsWe introduce RANKCORR, a fast method with strong mathematical underpinnings that performs multi-class marker selection in an informed manner. RANKCORR proceeds by ranking the mRNA counts data before linearly separating the ranked data using a small number of genes. The step of ranking is intuitively natural for scRNA-seq data and provides a non-parametric method for analyzing count data. In addition, we present several performance measures for evaluating the quality of a set of markers when there is no known ground truth. Using these metrics, we compare the performance of RANKCORR to a variety of other marker selection methods on an assortment of experimental and synthetic data sets that range in size from several thousand to one million cells.
conclusionsAccording to the metrics introduced in this work, RANKCORR is consistently one of most optimal marker selection methods on scRNA-seq data. Most methods show similar overall performance, however; thus, the speed of the algorithm is the most important consideration for large data sets (and comparing the markers selected by several methods can be fruitful). RANKCORR is fast enough to easily handle the largest data sets and, as such, it is a useful tool to add into computational pipelines when dealing with high throughput scRNA-seq data. RANKCORR software is available for download at https://github.com/ahsv/RankCorr with extensive documentation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.