Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33097004›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2020

A rank-based marker selection method for high throughput scRNA-seq data.

Alexander H S Vargo, Anna C Gilbert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Optimal marker genes forGenome research · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. MarkerMap: nonlinear marker selection for single-cell studies.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Alexander H S VargoDepartment of Mathematics, University of Michigan, 530 Church Street, Ann Arbor, 48109, USA. ahsvargo@umich.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5930-8841
Anna C GilbertDepartment of Mathematics, Yale University, 10 Hillhouse Ave, New Haven, 06511, USA.

Funding

Chan Zuckerberg Initiative Not availableThe Michigan Institute for Data Science Not available
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHigh throughput microfluidic protocols in single cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) collect mRNA counts from up to one million individual cells in a single experiment; this enables high resolution studies of rare cell types and cell development pathways. Determining small sets of genetic markers that can identify specific cell populations is thus one of the major objectives of computational analysis of mRNA counts data. Many tools have been developed for marker selection on single cell data; most of them, however, are based on complex statistical models and handle the multi-class case in an ad-hoc manner.

resultsWe introduce RANKCORR, a fast method with strong mathematical underpinnings that performs multi-class marker selection in an informed manner. RANKCORR proceeds by ranking the mRNA counts data before linearly separating the ranked data using a small number of genes. The step of ranking is intuitively natural for scRNA-seq data and provides a non-parametric method for analyzing count data. In addition, we present several performance measures for evaluating the quality of a set of markers when there is no known ground truth. Using these metrics, we compare the performance of RANKCORR to a variety of other marker selection methods on an assortment of experimental and synthetic data sets that range in size from several thousand to one million cells.

conclusionsAccording to the metrics introduced in this work, RANKCORR is consistently one of most optimal marker selection methods on scRNA-seq data. Most methods show similar overall performance, however; thus, the speed of the algorithm is the most important consideration for large data sets (and comparing the markers selected by several methods can be fruitful). RANKCORR is fast enough to easily handle the largest data sets and, as such, it is a useful tool to add into computational pipelines when dealing with high throughput scRNA-seq data. RANKCORR software is available for download at https://github.com/ahsv/RankCorr with extensive documentation.

Indexed as

Databases, GeneticHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingSingle-Cell AnalysisAlgorithmsAnimalsBase SequenceBone Marrow CellsCluster AnalysisComputer SimulationGene Expression ProfilingGenetic MarkersHumansMiceROC CurveSoftwareGenetic MarkersAlgorithmsBenchmarkingData analysisMachine learningMarker selectionSingle cell RNA-seq

Identifiers

PMID33097004
PMCPMC7585212

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.