Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33096773›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020

How Can the Lived Environment Support Healthy Ageing? A Spatial Indicators Framework for the Assessment of Age-Friendly Communities.

Melanie Davern, Rachel Winterton, Kathleen Brasher, Geoff Woolcock

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
19.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 80 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Developing Indicators of Age-Friendliness in Taiwanese Communities through a Modified Delphi Method.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Age-Friendly Cities and Communities: State of the Art and Future Perspectives.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  17. A Commentary on Blue ZonesInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  18. Healthy Places for Children: The Critical Role of Engagement, Common Vision, and Collaboration.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Melanie DavernHealthy Liveable Cities Group, Centre for Urban Research, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3790-0024
Rachel WintertonJohn Richards Centre for Rural Ageing Research, La Trobe Rural Health School, La Trobe University, Bendigo, VIC 3550, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5972-9918
Kathleen BrasherAge-Friendly Northeast Victoria, Central Hume Primary Care Partnership, Benalla, VIC 3672, Australia.
Geoff WoolcockInstitute for Resilient Regions, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, QLD 4350, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1904-7066
La Trobe University · AUThe University of Melbourne · AUUniversity of Southern Queensland · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Age-Friendly Cities and Communities Guide was released by the World Health Organization over a decade ago with the aim of creating environments that support healthy ageing. The comprehensive framework includes the domains of outdoor spaces and buildings, transportation, housing, social participation, respect and inclusion, civic participation and employment, communication and information, and community and health services. A major critique of the age-friendly community movement has argued for a more clearly defined scope of actions, the need to measure or quantify results and increase the connections to policy and funding levers. This paper provides a quantifiable spatial indicators framework to assess local lived environments according to each Age-Friendly Cities and Communities (AFC) domain. The selection of these AFC spatial indicators can be applied within local neighbourhoods, census tracts, suburbs, municipalities, or cities with minimal resource requirements other than applied spatial analysis, which addresses past critiques of the Age-Friendly Community movement. The framework has great potential for applications within local, national, and international policy and planning contexts in the future.

Indexed as

Healthy AgingHousingResidence CharacteristicsTransportationAgedAged, 80 and overCitiesHumansMiddle Agedage-friendlyhealthindicatorsneighbourhoodsplanningspatialtools

Identifiers

PMID33096773
PMCPMC7588877
OpenAlexW3093979189

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.