ArticleTranslational oncology2021
Classification of gastric cancers based on immunogenomic profiling.
Article in Translational oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advances in the molecular subtyping of gastric cancer.World journal of surgical oncology · 2026Review
- Current Role of Artificial Intelligence in the Management of Gastric Cancer.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Deep Clustering-Based Immunotherapy Prediction for Gastric Cancer mRNA Vaccine Development.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Big Data and Artificial Intelligence in Drug Discovery for Gastric Cancer: Current Applications and Future Perspectives.Current medicinal chemistry · 2025Review
- Research advances in the molecular classification of gastric cancer.Cellular oncology (Dordrecht, Netherlands) · 2024Review
- Identification of an immune gene-associated prognostic signature in patients with bladder cancer.Cancer gene therapy · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundExtensive evidence showed that gastric cancer (GC) is heterogeneous, and many studies have been focused on identifying GC subtypes based on genomic profiles. However, few studies have specifically explored the GC classification and predicted the classification accuracy that may help facilitate the optimal stratification of GC patients responsive to immunotherapy.
methodsUsing two publicly available GC genomics datasets, we classified GC on the basis of 797 immune related genes. Unsupervised and supervised machine learning methods were used to predict the classification.
resultsWe identified two GC subtypes that we named as Immunity-High (IM-H) and Immunity- Low (IM-L), and demonstrated that this classification was duplicable and predictable by analyzing other datasets. IM-H subtype was characterized by greater immune cell infiltration, stronger immune activities, lower tumor purity, as well as worse survival prognosis compared to IM-L subtype. Besides the immune signatures, some cancer-associated pathways were hyperactivated in IM-H, including TGF-beta signaling pathway, Focal adhesion, Cell adhesion molecules (CAMs), Calcium signaling pathway, mTOR signaling pathway, MAPK signaling pathway and Wnt signaling pathway. In contrast, IM-L presented depressed immune signatures and increased activation of base excision repair, DNA replication, homologous recombination, non-homologous end-joining and nucleotide excision repair pathways. Furthermore, we identified subtype-specific genomic or clinical features, and subtype-specific gene ontology and networks in IM-H and IM-L subtype.
conclusionsWe proposed and validated two reproducible immune molecular subtypes of GC, which has potential clinical implications for GC patient selection of immunotherapy.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.