Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33096238›Full record

ArticleMethods (San Diego, Calif.)2021

High-throughput genotyping of high-homology mutant mouse strains by next-generation sequencing.

Diane Gleeson, Debarati Sethi, Radka Platte, Jonathan Burvill, Daniel Barrett, Shaheen Akhtar, Michaela Bruntraeger, Joanna Bottomley, Sanger Mouse Genetics Project, James Bussell and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Methods (San Diego, Calif.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Diane GleesonWellcome Sanger Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge CB10 1SA, UK.
Debarati SethiWellcome Sanger Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge CB10 1SA, UK.
Radka PlatteWellcome Sanger Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge CB10 1SA, UK.
Jonathan BurvillWellcome Sanger Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge CB10 1SA, UK.
Daniel BarrettWellcome Sanger Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge CB10 1SA, UK.
Shaheen AkhtarWellcome Sanger Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge CB10 1SA, UK.
Michaela BruntraegerWellcome Sanger Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge CB10 1SA, UK.
Joanna BottomleyWellcome Sanger Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge CB10 1SA, UK.
Sanger Mouse Genetics ProjectWellcome Sanger Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge CB10 1SA, UK.
James BussellWellcome Sanger Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge CB10 1SA, UK.
Edward RyderWellcome Sanger Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge CB10 1SA, UK. Electronic address: edward.ryder@lgcgroup.com.

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust WT206194
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genotyping of knockout alleles in mice is commonly performed by end-point PCR or gene-specific/universal cassette qPCR. Both have advantages and limitations in terms of assay design and interpretation of results. As an alternative method for high-throughput genotyping, we investigated next generation sequencing (NGS) of PCR amplicons, with a focus on CRISPR-mediated exon deletions where antibiotic selection markers are not present. By multiplexing the wild type and mutant-specific PCR reactions, the genotype can be called by the relative sequence counts of each product. The system is highly scalable and can be applied to a variety of different allele types, including those produced by the International Mouse Phenotyping Consortium and associated projects. One potential challenge with any assay design is locating unique areas of the genome, especially when working with gene families or regions of high homology. These can result in misleading or ambiguous genotypes for either qPCR or end-point assays. Here, we show that genotyping by NGS can negate these issues by simple, automated filtering of undesired sequences. Analysis and genotype calls can also be fully automated, using FASTQ or FASTA input files and an in-house Perl script and SQL database.

Indexed as

Genotyping TechniquesHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingAllelesAnimalsGenotypeMiceMice, Mutant StrainsPolymerase Chain ReactionCRISPRGenotypingMouseMutantNGSQC

Identifiers

PMID33096238
PMCPMC8205115

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.