Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33096154›Full record

ReviewBiochimica et biophysica acta. Reviews on cancer2020

Power of two: combination of therapeutic approaches involving glucose transporter (GLUT) inhibitors to combat cancer.

Kalpana Tilekar, Neha Upadhyay, Cristina V Iancu, Vadim Pokrovsky, Jun-Yong Choe, C S Ramaa

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biochimica et biophysica acta. Reviews on cancer, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Integrating Metabolic Modulation and Nanomedicine for Cancer Immunotherapy.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Exploring SGLT2 Inhibitors' Activity in Breast Cancer: An Overview.Current topics in medicinal chemistry · 2025
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Kalpana TilekarDepartment of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Bharati Vidyapeeth's College of Pharmacy, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Neha UpadhyayDepartment of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Bharati Vidyapeeth's College of Pharmacy, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Cristina V IancuEast Carolina Diabetes and Obesity Institute, Department of Chemistry, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, USA.
Vadim PokrovskyLaboratory of Combined Therapy, N.N. Blokhin Cancer Research Center, Moscow, Russia; Department of Biochemistry, People's Friendship University, Moscow, Russia.
Jun-Yong ChoeEast Carolina Diabetes and Obesity Institute, Department of Chemistry, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, USA.
C S RamaaDepartment of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Bharati Vidyapeeth's College of Pharmacy, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India. Electronic address: sinharamaa@yahoo.in.
Bharati Vidyapeeth Deemed University · INEast Carolina University · USPeoples' Friendship University of Russia · RU

Funding

Ligand Specificity In Human Glucose Transporters GLUT1-5 and GLUT9R01GM123103 · NIGMS · ROSALIND FRANKLIN UNIV OF MEDICINE & SCI · PI CHOE, JUN-YONG, OPREA, TUDOR I · 2017 to 2020
$1.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM123103
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer research of the Warburg effect, a hallmark metabolic alteration in tumors, focused attention on glucose metabolism whose targeting uncovered several agents with promising anticancer effects at the preclinical level. These agents' monotherapy points to their potential as adjuvant combination therapy to existing standard chemotherapy in human trials. Accordingly, several studies on combining glucose transporter (GLUT) inhibitors with chemotherapeutic agents, such as doxorubicin, paclitaxel, and cytarabine, showed synergistic or additive anticancer effects, reduced chemo-, radio-, and immuno-resistance, and reduced toxicity due to lowering the therapeutic doses required for desired chemotherapeutic effects, as compared with monotherapy. The combinations have been specifically effective in treating cancer glycolytic phenotypes, such as pancreatic and breast cancers. Even combining GLUT inhibitors with other glycolytic inhibitors and energy restriction mimetics seems worthwhile. Though combination clinical trials are in the early phase, initial results are intriguing. The various types of GLUTs, their role in cancer progression, GLUT inhibitors, and their anticancer mechanism of action have been reviewed several times. However, utilizing GLUT inhibitors as combination therapeutics has received little attention. We consider GLUT inhibitors agents that directly affect glucose transporters by binding to them or indirectly alter glucose transport by changing the transporters' expression level. This review mainly focuses on summarizing the effects of various combinations of GLUT inhibitors with other anticancer agents and providing a perspective on the current status.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsClinical Trials as TopicDrug SynergismGlucose Transport Proteins, FacilitativeGlycolysisHumansMolecular StructureNeoplasmsAntineoplastic AgentsGlucose Transport Proteins, FacilitativeCancerCombination strategyDrug synergyGlucose transporters (GLUTs)GLUT inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID33096154
PMCPMC7704680
OpenAlexW3094068511

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.