Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33096126›Full record

ArticlePreventive medicine2020

Implementation science: Scaling a training intervention to include IUDs and implants in contraceptive services in primary care.

Cynthia C Harper, Alison B Comfort, Maya Blum, Corinne H Rocca, Charles E McCulloch, Lavanya Rao, Nishant Shah, Helen Oquendo Del Toro, Suzan Goodman

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Preventive medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. "I liked having my voice heard:" a feasible, rapid approach for codesigning a contraceptive counseling curriculum.Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Implementation of Title X Family Planning Services in Primary Care: A Qualitative Study of a Primary Care Network in Georgia.Women's health issues : official publication of the Jacobs Institute of Women's Health
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Cynthia C HarperBixby Center for Global Reproductive Health, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco School of Medicine, United States of America. Electronic address: Cynthia.harper@ucsf.edu.
Alison B ComfortBixby Center for Global Reproductive Health, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco School of Medicine, United States of America.
Maya BlumBixby Center for Global Reproductive Health, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco School of Medicine, United States of America.
Corinne H RoccaBixby Center for Global Reproductive Health, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco School of Medicine, United States of America.
Charles E McCullochDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco School of Medicine, United States of America.
Lavanya RaoBixby Center for Global Reproductive Health, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco School of Medicine, United States of America.
Nishant ShahConsultant, Bixby Center for Global Reproductive Health, University of California, San Francisco, School of Medicine, United States of America.
Helen Oquendo Del ToroDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, United States of America.
Suzan GoodmanBixby Center for Global Reproductive Health, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco School of Medicine, United States of America; Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of California, San Francisco School of Medicine, United States of America.
Ibis Reproductive Health · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of New Mexico · US

Funding

UCSF/Kaiser-DOR Program for Developing Independent Women's Health ResearchersK12HD052163 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI ADLER, NANCY E, BRINDIS, CLAIRE D. · 2005 to 2023
$9.3M
NICHD NIH HHS K12 HD052163
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Building capacity for contraceptive services in primary care settings, including for intrauterine devices (IUDs) and implants, can help to broaden contraceptive access across the US. Following a randomized trial in family planning clinics, we brought a provider training intervention to other clinical settings including primary care in all regions. This implementation science study evaluates a national scale-up of a contraceptive training intervention to varied practice settings from 2013 to 2019 among 3216 clinic staff serving an estimated 1.6 million annual contraceptive patients. We measured providers' knowledge and clinical practice changes regarding IUDs and implants using survey data. We estimated the overall intervention effect, and its relative effectiveness in primary care settings, with generalized estimating equations for clustered data. Patient-centered counseling improved, along with comfort with method provision and removal. Provider knowledge increased (p < 0.001), as did evidence-based counseling for IUDs (aOR 3.3 95% CI 2.8-3.9) and implants (aOR 3.5, 95% CI 3.0-4.1), and clinician competency in copper and levonorgestrel IUDs (aORs 1.8-2.6 95% CIs 1.5-3.2) and implants (aOR 2.4 95% CI 2.0-2.9). While proficiency was lower initially in primary care, gains were significant and at times greater than in Planned Parenthood health clinics. This intervention was effectively scaled, including in primary care settings with limited prior experience with these methods. Recent changes to Title X family planning funding rules exclude several large family planning providers, shifting greater responsibility to primary care and other settings. Scaling effective contraceptive interventions is one way to ensure capacity to offer patients full contraceptive services.

Indexed as

Contraceptive AgentsIntrauterine DevicesFamily Planning ServicesFemaleHumansImplementation SciencePrimary Health CareContraceptive AgentsContraceptive accessImplementation scienceIntrauterine devicesPrimary careProvider training interventionSubdermal implant

Identifiers

PMID33096126
PMCPMC8032203
OpenAlexW3094573497

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.