Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33095980›Full record

ArticleMolecular genetics & genomic medicine2020

Next-generation sequencing identifies rare pathogenic and novel candidate variants in a cohort of Chinese patients with syndromic or nonsyndromic hearing loss.

Yan-Bao Xiang, Chen-Yang Xu, Yun-Zhi Xu, Huan-Zheng Li, Li-Li Zhou, Xue-Qin Xu, Zi-Hui Chen, Shao-Hua Tang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular genetics & genomic medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. [The natural history of the relationship betweenLin chuang er bi yan hou tou jing wai ke za zhi = Journal of clinical otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yan-Bao XiangKey Laboratory of Birth Defects, Department of Genetics, Wenzhou Central Hospital, Wenzhou, China.
Chen-Yang XuKey Laboratory of Birth Defects, Department of Genetics, Wenzhou Central Hospital, Wenzhou, China.
Yun-Zhi XuKey Laboratory of Birth Defects, Department of Genetics, Wenzhou Central Hospital, Wenzhou, China.
Huan-Zheng LiKey Laboratory of Birth Defects, Department of Genetics, Wenzhou Central Hospital, Wenzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4625-3057
Li-Li ZhouKey Laboratory of Birth Defects, Department of Genetics, Wenzhou Central Hospital, Wenzhou, China.
Xue-Qin XuKey Laboratory of Birth Defects, Department of Genetics, Wenzhou Central Hospital, Wenzhou, China.
Zi-Hui ChenKey laboratory of Medical Genetic, School of Laboratory Medicine and Life Science, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Shao-Hua TangKey Laboratory of Birth Defects, Department of Genetics, Wenzhou Central Hospital, Wenzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0002-2918-8532
Wenzhou Central Hospital · CNWenzhou Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHearing loss (HL) is a common sensory disorder in humans characterized by extreme clinical and genetic heterogeneity. In recent years, next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies have proven to be highly effective and powerful tools for population genetic studies of HL. Here, we analyzed clinical and molecular data from 21 Chinese deaf families who did not have hotspot mutations in the common deafness genes GJB2, SLC26A4, GJB3, and MT-RNR1.

methodTargeted next-generation sequencing (TGS) of 127 known deafness genes was performed in probands of 12 families, while whole-exome sequencing (WES) or trio-WES was used for the remaining nine families.

resultsPotential pathogenic mutations in a total of 12 deafness genes were identified in 13 probands; the mutations were observed in GJB2, CDH23, EDNRB, MYO15A, OTOA, OTOF, TBC1D24, SALL1, TMC1, TWNK, USH1C, and USH1G, with eight of the identified mutations being novel. Further, a copy number variant (CNV) was detected in one proband with heterozygous deletion of chromosome 4p16.3-4p15.32. Thus, the total diagnostic rate using NGS in our deafness patients reached 66.67% (14/21).

conclusionsThese results expand the mutation spectrum of deafness-causing genes and provide support for the use of NGS detection technologies for routine molecular diagnosis in Chinese deaf populations.

Indexed as

Genetic LociMutationAdolescentAdultChildChild, PreschoolDeafnessExome SequencingFemaleGene FrequencyHumansMaleMiddle AgedPedigreehearing lossmolecular diagnosisnext-generation sequencing

Identifiers

PMID33095980
PMCPMC7767562
OpenAlexW3093481488

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.