Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33095854›Full record

ArticleCerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)2021

A Comparison of Quantitative R1 and Cortical Thickness in Identifying Age, Lifespan Dynamics, and Disease States of the Human Cortex.

A Erramuzpe, R Schurr, J D Yeatman, I H Gotlib, M D Sacchet, K E Travis, H M Feldman, A A Mezer

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Quantitative MRI of the hippocampus reveals microstructural trajectories of aging and Alzheimer's disease pathology.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Normative trajectories of RImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Local Brain-Age: A U-Net Model.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

A ErramuzpeThe Hebrew University of Jerusalem, The Edmond and Lily Safra Center for Brain Sciences, Jerusalem, Israel.
R SchurrThe Hebrew University of Jerusalem, The Edmond and Lily Safra Center for Brain Sciences, Jerusalem, Israel.
J D YeatmanGraduate School of Education, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
I H GotlibPsychology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
M D SacchetHarvard Medical School, Center for Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Research, McLean Hospital, Belmont, MA, USA.
K E TravisPediatrics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
H M FeldmanDevelopment and Behavior Unit, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
A A MezerThe Hebrew University of Jerusalem, The Edmond and Lily Safra Center for Brain Sciences, Jerusalem, Israel.

Funding

Psychobiological Mechanisms Underlying the Association Between Early Life Stress and Depression Across AdolescenceR37MH101495 · NIMH · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI IAN H GOTLIB · 2018 to 2026
$6.6M
Development of Face Perception: Cross-sectional and Longitudinal InvestigationsR01EY022318 · NEI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI GRILL-SPECTOR, KALANIT · 2012 to 2022
$5.2M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY022318NIMH NIH HHS R37 MH101495
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brain development and aging are complex processes that unfold in multiple brain regions simultaneously. Recently, models of brain age prediction have aroused great interest, as these models can potentially help to understand neurological diseases and elucidate basic neurobiological mechanisms. We test whether quantitative magnetic resonance imaging can contribute to such age prediction models. Using R1, the longitudinal rate of relaxation, we explore lifespan dynamics in cortical gray matter. We compare R1 with cortical thickness, a well-established biomarker of brain development and aging. Using 160 healthy individuals (6-81 years old), we found that R1 and cortical thickness predicted age similarly, but the regions contributing to the prediction differed. Next, we characterized R1 development and aging dynamics. Compared with anterior regions, in posterior regions we found an earlier R1 peak but a steeper postpeak decline. We replicate these findings: firstly, we tested a subset (N = 10) of the original dataset for whom we had additional scans at a lower resolution; and second, we verified the results on an independent dataset (N = 34). Finally, we compared the age prediction models on a subset of 10 patients with multiple sclerosis. The patients are predicted older than their chronological age using R1 but not with cortical thickness.

Indexed as

Brain Cortical ThicknessAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAgingCerebral CortexChildFemaleGray MatterHumansLongevityMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedMultiple Sclerosisagingcortexmultiple sclerosispredictionqMRI

Identifiers

PMID33095854
PMCPMC8485079

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.