Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33095836›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

A national cross-sectional survey of public perceptions of the COVID-19 pandemic: Self-reported beliefs, knowledge, and behaviors.

Jeanna Parsons Leigh, Kirsten Fiest, Rebecca Brundin-Mather, Kara Plotnikoff, Andrea Soo, Emma E Sypes, Liam Whalen-Browne, Sofia B Ahmed, Karen E A Burns, Alison Fox-Robichaud and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
36.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 116 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Irish Media Coverage of COVID-19 Evidence-Based Research Reports From One National Agency.International journal of health policy and management · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Jeanna Parsons LeighFaculty of Health, School of Health Administration, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Kirsten FiestDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Rebecca Brundin-MatherDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-4576-6232
Kara PlotnikoffDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Andrea SooDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Emma E SypesDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Liam Whalen-BrowneDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1335-9413
Sofia B AhmedDepartment of Medicine and Libin Cardiovascular Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Karen E A BurnsInterdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Alison Fox-RobichaudDepartment of Medicine, Division of Critical Care, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-9912-3606
Shelly KupschDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Shelly LongmoreDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Srinivas MurthyFaculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver British Columbia, Canada.
Daniel J NivenDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Bram RochwergDepartment of Medicine, Division of Critical Care, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Henry T StelfoxDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
University of Calgary · CADalhousie University · CAHamilton Health Sciences · CAImpact · CASt. Michael's Hospital · CAUniversity of British Columbia · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionEfforts to mitigate the global spread of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) causing Corona Virus Disease-19 (COVID-19) have largely relied on broad compliance with public health recommendations yet navigating the high volume of evolving information can be challenging. We assessed self-reported public perceptions related to COVID-19 including, beliefs (e.g., severity, concerns, health), knowledge (e.g., transmission, information sources), and behaviors (e.g., physical distancing) to understand perspectives in Canada and to inform future public health initiatives.

methodsWe administered a national online survey aiming to obtain responses from 2000 adults in Canada. Respondent sampling was stratified by age, sex, and region. We used descriptive statistics to summarize responses and tested for regional differences using chi-squared tests, followed by weighted logistic regression.

resultsWe collected 1,996 eligible questionnaires between April 26th and May 1st, 2020. One-fifth (20%) of respondents knew someone diagnosed with COVID-19, but few had tested positive themselves (0.6%). Negative impacts of pandemic conditions were evidenced in several areas, including concerns about healthcare (e.g. sufficient equipment, 52%), pandemic stress (45%), and worsening social (49%) and mental/emotional (39%) health. Most respondents (88%) felt they had good to excellent knowledge of virus transmission, and predominantly accessed (74%) and trusted (60%) Canadian news television, newspapers/magazines, or non-government news websites for COVID-19 information. We found high compliance with distancing measures (80% reported self-isolating or always physical distancing). We identified associations between region and self-reported beliefs, knowledge, and behaviors related to COVID-19. DISCUSSION: We found that information about COVID-19 is largely acquired through domestic news sources, which may explain high self-reported compliance with prevention measures. The results highlight the broader impact of a pandemic on the general public's overall health and wellbeing, outside of personal infection. The study findings should be used to inform public health communications during COVID-19 and future pandemics.

Indexed as

Attitude to HealthBetacoronavirusHealth BehaviorPublic OpinionSelf ReportAdolescentAdultAgedCanadaCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19Cross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansInformation DisseminationMale

Identifiers

PMID33095836
PMCPMC7584165
OpenAlexW3094461804

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.