Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33095759›Full record

ArticlePLoS medicine2020

Effectiveness of the 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine against vaccine serotype pneumococcal pneumonia in adults: A case-control test-negative design study.

Hannah Lawrence, Harry Pick, Vadsala Baskaran, Priya Daniel, Chamira Rodrigo, Deborah Ashton, Rochelle C Edwards-Pritchard, Carmen Sheppard, Seyi D Eletu, David Litt and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 80 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. [The new 15-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine for the prevention ofJournal of preventive medicine and hygiene · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Hannah LawrenceDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-5709-0233
Harry PickDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-1595-7919
Vadsala BaskaranDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-6470-5726
Priya DanielDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, University Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation Trust, Derby, United Kingdom.
Chamira RodrigoDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Deborah AshtonDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-7415-9282
Rochelle C Edwards-PritchardDivision of Respiratory Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-9248-2865
Carmen SheppardRespiratory and Vaccine Preventable Bacteria Reference Unit, Public Health England-National Infection Service, Colindale, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-2699-9057
Seyi D EletuRespiratory and Vaccine Preventable Bacteria Reference Unit, Public Health England-National Infection Service, Colindale, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-2151-6706
David LittRespiratory and Vaccine Preventable Bacteria Reference Unit, Public Health England-National Infection Service, Colindale, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-9215-0553
Norman K FryRespiratory and Vaccine Preventable Bacteria Reference Unit, Public Health England-National Infection Service, Colindale, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-4862-6507
Samuel RoseRespiratory and Vaccine Preventable Bacteria Reference Unit, Public Health England-National Infection Service, Colindale, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-3848-6790
Caroline TrotterDisease Dynamic Unit, Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Tricia M McKeeverDivision of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Wei Shen LimDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust · GBPublic Health England · GBUniversity of Nottingham · GBUniversity Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GB

Funding

Department of Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVaccination with the 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPV23) is available in the United Kingdom to adults aged 65 years or older and those in defined clinical risk groups. We evaluated the vaccine effectiveness (VE) of PPV23 against vaccine-type pneumococcal pneumonia in a cohort of adults hospitalised with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). METHODS AND

findingsUsing a case-control test-negative design, a secondary analysis of data was conducted from a prospective cohort study of adults (aged ≥16 years) with CAP hospitalised at 2 university teaching hospitals in Nottingham, England, from September 2013 to August 2018. The exposure of interest was PPV23 vaccination at any time point prior to the index admission. A case was defined as PPV23 serotype-specific pneumococcal pneumonia and a control as non-PPV23 serotype pneumococcal pneumonia or nonpneumococcal pneumonia. Pneumococcal serotypes were identified from urine samples using a multiplex immunoassay or from positive blood cultures. Multivariable logistic regression was used to derive adjusted odds of case status between vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals; VE estimates were calculated as (1 - odds ratio) × 100%. Of 2,357 patients, there were 717 PPV23 cases (48% vaccinated) and 1,640 controls (54.5% vaccinated). The adjusted VE (aVE) estimate against PPV23 serotype disease was 24% (95% CI 5%-40%, p = 0.02). Estimates were similar in analyses restricted to vaccine-eligible patients (n = 1,768, aVE 23%, 95% CI 1%-40%) and patients aged ≥65 years (n = 1,407, aVE 20%, 95% CI -5% to 40%), but not in patients aged ≥75 years (n = 905, aVE 5%, 95% CI -37% to 35%). The aVE estimate in relation to PPV23/non-13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV13) serotype pneumonia (n = 417 cases, 43.7% vaccinated) was 29% (95% CI 6%-46%). Key limitations of this study are that, due to high vaccination rates, there was a lack of power to reject the null hypothesis of no vaccine effect, and that the study was not large enough to allow robust subgroup analysis in the older age groups.

conclusionsIn the setting of an established national childhood PCV13 vaccination programme, PPV23 vaccination of clinical at-risk patient groups and adults aged ≥65 years provided moderate long-term protection against hospitalisation with PPV23 serotype pneumonia. These findings suggest that PPV23 vaccination may continue to have an important role in adult pneumococcal vaccine policy, including the possibility of revaccination of older adults.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overCase-Control StudiesCommunity-Acquired InfectionsFemaleHospitalizationHumansMaleMiddle AgedOdds RatioPneumococcal InfectionsPneumococcal VaccinesPneumonia, PneumococcalProspective StudiesSerogroup23-valent pneumococcal capsular polysaccharide vaccinePneumococcal VaccinesVaccines, Conjugate

Identifiers

PMID33095759
PMCPMC7584218
OpenAlexW3093698897

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.