Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33095748›Full record

ArticleIET systems biology2020

Formal reasoning about synthetic biology using higher-order-logic theorem proving.

Sa'ed Abed, Adnan Rashid, Osman Hasan

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IET systems biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Sa'ed AbedComputer Engineering Department, College of Engineering and Petroleum, Kuwait University, Kuwait. s.abed@ku.edu.kw.
Adnan RashidSchool of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science (SEECS), National University of Sciences and Technology (NUST), Islamabad, Pakistan.
Osman HasanSchool of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science (SEECS), National University of Sciences and Technology (NUST), Islamabad, Pakistan.
National University of Sciences and Technology · PKKuwait Petroleum Corporation (Kuwait) · KW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Synthetic biology is an interdisciplinary field that uses well-established engineering principles for performing the analysis of the biological systems, such as biological circuits, pathways, controllers and enzymes. Conventionally, the analysis of these biological systems is performed using paper-and-pencil proofs and computer simulation methods. However, these methods cannot ensure accurate results due to their inherent limitations. Higher-order-logic (HOL) theorem proving is proposed and used as a complementary approach for analysing linear biological systems, which is based on developing a mathematical model of the genetic circuits and the bio-controllers used in synthetic biology based on HOL and analysing it using deductive reasoning in an interactive theorem prover. The involvement of the logic, mathematics and the deductive reasoning in this method ensures the accuracy of the analysis. It is proposed to model the continuous dynamics of the genetic circuits and their associated controllers using differential equations and perform their transfer function-based analysis using the Laplace transform in a theorem prover. For illustration, the genetic circuits of activated and repressed expressions and autoactivation of protein, and phase lag and lead controllers, which are widely used in cancer-cell identifiers and multi-input receptors for precise disease detection, are formally analyzed.

Indexed as

Gene Regulatory NetworksSynthetic BiologyAlgorithmsComputer SimulationHumansLogicModels, BiologicalModels, Genetic

Identifiers

PMID33095748
PMCPMC8687371
OpenAlexW3089558359

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.