ArticleIET systems biology2020
Experimental evidence for constraints in amplitude-timescale co-variation of a biomolecular pulse generating circuit design.
Article in IET systems biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Understanding constraints on the functional properties of biomolecular circuit dynamics, such as the possible variations of amplitude and timescale of a pulse, is an important part of biomolecular circuit design. While the amplitude-timescale co-variations of the pulse in an incoherent feedforward loop have been investigated computationally using mathematical models, experimental support for any such constraints is relatively unclear. Here, the authors address this using experimental measurement of an existing pulse generating incoherent feedforward loop circuit realisation in the context of a standard mathematical model. They characterise the trends of co-variation in the pulse amplitude and rise time computationally by randomly exploring the parameter space. They experimentally measured the co-variation by varying inducers and found that larger amplitude pulses have a slower rise time. They discuss the gap between the experimental measurements and predictions of the standard model, highlighting model additions and other biological factors that might bridge the gap.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.