Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33095555›Full record

ArticleJournal of chemical theory and computation2020

RLDOCK: A New Method for Predicting RNA-Ligand Interactions.

Li-Zhen Sun, Yangwei Jiang, Yuanzhe Zhou, Shi-Jie Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chemical theory and computation, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Machine Learning for RNA-Targeting Drug Design.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2026
    Review
  5. Comparative Evaluation of Explicit Solvent Models for RNA-Ligand Docking.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. ACS chemical biology · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Computational Ligand-Binding Site Prediction.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Li-Zhen SunDepartment of Applied Physics, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310023, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4863-7812
Yangwei JiangDepartment of Physics, Department of Biochemistry, and Informatics Institute, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri 65211, United States.
Yuanzhe ZhouDepartment of Physics, Department of Biochemistry, and Informatics Institute, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri 65211, United States.
Shi-Jie ChenDepartment of Physics, Department of Biochemistry, and Informatics Institute, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri 65211, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8093-7244

Funding

New methods for computational modeling of RNA structuresR35GM134919 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI-COLUMBIA · PI SHI-JIE CHEN · 2020 to 2026
$3.3M
New computational tools for predicting ion effects in RNA structuresR01GM117059 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI-COLUMBIA · PI CHEN, SHI-JIE · 2017 to 2020
$1.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM117059NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM134919
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ability to accurately predict the binding site, binding pose, and binding affinity for ligand-RNA binding is important for RNA-targeted drug design. Here, we describe a new computational method, RLDOCK, for predicting the binding site and binding pose for ligand-RNA binding. By developing an energy-based scoring function, we sample exhaustively all of the possible binding sites with flexible ligand conformations for a ligand-RNA pair based on the geometric and energetic scores. The model distinguishes from other approaches in three notable features. First, the model enables exhaustive scanning of all of the possible binding sites, including multiple alternative or coexisting binding sites, for a given ligand-RNA pair. Second, the model is based on a new energy-based scoring function developed here. Third, the model employs a novel multistep screening algorithm to improve computational efficiency. Specifically, first, for each binding site, we use a gird-based energy map to rank the binding sites according to the minimum Lennard-Jones potential energy for the different ligand poses. Second, for a given selected binding site, we predict the ligand pose using a two-step algorithm. In the first step, we quickly identify the probable ligand poses using a coarse-grained simplified energy function. In the second step, for each of the probable ligand poses, we predict the ligand poses using a refined energy function. Tests of the RLDOCK for a set of 230 RNA-ligand-bound structures indicate that RLDOCK can successfully predict ligand poses for 27.8, 58.3, and 69.6% of all of the test cases with the root-mean-square deviation within 1.0, 2.0, and 3.0 Å, respectively, for the top three predicted docking poses. The computational method presented here may enable the development of a new, more comprehensive framework for the prediction of ligand-RNA binding with an ensemble of RNA conformations and the metal-ion effects.

Indexed as

Models, MolecularBase PairingLigandsRNAThermodynamicsLigandsRNA

Identifiers

PMID33095555
PMCPMC7882445

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.