ArticleJournal of chemical theory and computation2020
RLDOCK: A New Method for Predicting RNA-Ligand Interactions.
Article in Journal of chemical theory and computation, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
34 citing papers in PubMed.
- In silico designing of small molecules for targeting RNA: current landscape and future directions.Journal of computer-aided molecular design · 2026Review
- Drude SILCS-Nucleic: harnessing explicit electronic polarization in targeting RNA and DNA for drug design.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- Conjugation of hydrophobic drugs to motile pRNA 4WJ nanoparticles for spontaneous tumor targeting and undetectable toxicity.Nature protocols · 2026Review
- Machine Learning for RNA-Targeting Drug Design.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2026Review
- Comparative Evaluation of Explicit Solvent Models for RNA-Ligand Docking.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2026Article
- From mechanistic modeling to AI-driven design: computational strategies for targeting the γ-secretase complex.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Review
- Exploring Secondary Structure Predictions for RNA-Targeted Drug Discovery: Power and Challenges.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2026Article
- AI-Enhanced Adaptive Virtual Screening Platform Enabling Exploration of 69 Billion Molecules Discovers Structurally Validated FSP1 Inhibitors.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Article
- Predicting small molecule-RNA interactions without RNA tertiary structures.Nature biotechnology · 2026Article
- Computational Ligand-Binding Site Prediction.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026Review
- Drude SILCS-Nucleic: Harnessing Explicit Electronic Polarization in Targeting RNA and DNA for Drug Design.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- RLDOCKScore: A Scoring Function for RNA-Ligand Docking and Small Molecule Virtual Screening.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2025Article
- Review
- Single-step discovery of high-affinity RNA ligands by UltraSelex.Nature chemical biology · 2025Article
- Graph-RPI: predicting RNA-protein interactions via graph autoencoder and self-supervised learning strategies.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Article
- RNAmigos2: accelerated structure-based RNA virtual screening with deep graph learning.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Harnessing Computational Approaches for RNA-Targeted Drug Discovery.RNA nanomed · 2024Article
- SPRank─A Knowledge-Based Scoring Function for RNA-Ligand Pose Prediction and Virtual Screening.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2024Article
- Cracking the Code: Enhancing Molecular Tools for Progress in Nanobiotechnology.ACS applied bio materials · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The ability to accurately predict the binding site, binding pose, and binding affinity for ligand-RNA binding is important for RNA-targeted drug design. Here, we describe a new computational method, RLDOCK, for predicting the binding site and binding pose for ligand-RNA binding. By developing an energy-based scoring function, we sample exhaustively all of the possible binding sites with flexible ligand conformations for a ligand-RNA pair based on the geometric and energetic scores. The model distinguishes from other approaches in three notable features. First, the model enables exhaustive scanning of all of the possible binding sites, including multiple alternative or coexisting binding sites, for a given ligand-RNA pair. Second, the model is based on a new energy-based scoring function developed here. Third, the model employs a novel multistep screening algorithm to improve computational efficiency. Specifically, first, for each binding site, we use a gird-based energy map to rank the binding sites according to the minimum Lennard-Jones potential energy for the different ligand poses. Second, for a given selected binding site, we predict the ligand pose using a two-step algorithm. In the first step, we quickly identify the probable ligand poses using a coarse-grained simplified energy function. In the second step, for each of the probable ligand poses, we predict the ligand poses using a refined energy function. Tests of the RLDOCK for a set of 230 RNA-ligand-bound structures indicate that RLDOCK can successfully predict ligand poses for 27.8, 58.3, and 69.6% of all of the test cases with the root-mean-square deviation within 1.0, 2.0, and 3.0 Å, respectively, for the top three predicted docking poses. The computational method presented here may enable the development of a new, more comprehensive framework for the prediction of ligand-RNA binding with an ensemble of RNA conformations and the metal-ion effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.