Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33095365›Full record

ArticleNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2021

Open-source open-access reaction time test (OORTT): an easy tool to assess reaction times.

Mattia Rigoli, Alessio Facchin, Davide Cardile, Nicoletta Beschin, Claudio Luzzatti

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Regression-based normative data for Corsi Span and Supraspan learning and recall among Italian adults.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. A rank subdivision of equivalent score for enhancing neuropsychological test norms.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mattia RigoliDepartment of Psychology, University of Milano-Bicocca, Piazza dell'Ateneo Nuovo 1, 20126, Milano, Italy.
Alessio FacchinDepartment of Psychology, University of Milano-Bicocca, Piazza dell'Ateneo Nuovo 1, 20126, Milano, Italy. alessiopietro.facchin@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0604-5029
Davide CardileDepartment of Psychology, University of Milano-Bicocca, Piazza dell'Ateneo Nuovo 1, 20126, Milano, Italy.
Nicoletta BeschinNeuropsychology Service, Rehabilitation Department, A.S.S.T. Valle Olona, Varese, Italy.
Claudio LuzzattiDepartment of Psychology, University of Milano-Bicocca, Piazza dell'Ateneo Nuovo 1, 20126, Milano, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The speed of information processing is one of the most reliable indices of cognitive efficiency. The most common way to evaluate this ability is to assess reaction times (RTs). The technical limitations of previous tasks, aimed at measuring RT, have motivated us to develop a new battery for their evaluation. The aim of this study is to build an open-source, open-access reaction time test (OORTT), which has the following characteristics: rapid and easy administration, robust Italian normative data based on a wide age range, a simple scoring system, compatibility with all operating systems, no license or activation costs, and based on an open-source software platform. The battery is composed of three tasks: simple reaction times (SRT), Go/No-Go (GNG) condition, and four-position reaction times (4PRT). The battery was administered to 300 healthy participants aged between 14 and 89, and 3 groups of patients: 24 right brain-damaged; 21 left brain-damaged, and 19 degenerative cognitively impaired. We have developed specific norms for each task of the test battery: SRT, GNG, and 4PRT. Compared with healthy individuals, all groups obtained lower scores. More specifically, cognitively impaired patients obtained significantly longer RTs than healthy participants as well as unilateral brain-damaged patients. In the 4PRT task, right brain-damaged patients obtained a significantly left > right difference in RTs. In conclusion, the OORTT test battery proved to be a valuable tool which can be used in the clinical environment for cases of different attentional deficits after focal or degenerative brain damage.

Indexed as

CognitionCognition DisordersAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overHumansItalyMiddle AgedNeuropsychological TestsReaction TimeYoung AdultAttentionAttentional deficitsCognitive assessmentNeuropsychological testingReaction timesReference ranges

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.