ArticleAnnals of hematology2021
The clinical significance of PNH-phenotype cells accounting for < 0.01% of total granulocytes detected by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute methods in patients with bone marrow failure.
Article in Annals of hematology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Immunological links between aplastic anemia and paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria.International journal of hematology · 2026Review
- Diagnosis of immune pathophysiology in patients with bone marrow failure.International journal of hematology · 2024Review
- Clonality in immune aplastic anemia: Mechanisms of immune escape or malignant transformation.Seminars in hematology · 2022Review
- Frequent HLA-DR loss on hematopoietic stem progenitor cells in patients with cyclosporine-dependent aplastic anemia carrying HLA-DR15.Leukemia · 2022Article
- High Prevalence of PNH-phenotype Cells in Patients Who Received CD19-targeted CAR T-cell Therapy.HemaSphere · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
19 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Small populations of glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored protein-deficient (GPI[-]) cells accounting for up to 0.01% of total granulocytes can be accurately detected by a high-sensitivity flow cytometry (FCM) assay established by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI method) and have a prognostic value in bone marrow failure (BMF); however, the significance of GPI(-) granulocytes accounting for 0.001-0.009% of granulocytes remains unclear. To clarify this issue, we examined the peripheral blood of 21 BMF patients in whom minor (around 0.01%) populations of GPI(-) granulocytes had been previously detected by a different high-resolution FCM method (OPTIMA method, which defines ≥ 0.003% GPI(-) granulocytes as an abnormal increase) using both the CLSI and OPTIMA methods simultaneously. These two methods detected an "abnormal increase" in GPI(-) granulocytes in 10 patients (48%) and 17 patients (81%), respectively. CLSI detected 0.002-0.005% (median, 0.004%) GPI(-) granulocytes in 7 patients who were deemed positive for PNH-type cells according to the OPTIMA method, which detected 0.003-0.012% (median 0.006%) GPI(-) granulocytes. The clone sizes of GPI(-) cells detected by each assay were positively correlated (r = 0.994, p < 0.001). Of the seven patients who were judged positive for PNH-type cells by OPTIMA alone, five received immunosuppressive therapy, and all of them achieved a partial or complete response. GPI(-) granulocytes detected in BMF patients by the CLSI method should thus be considered significant, even at percentages of < 0.01%.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.