Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33095321›Full record

ArticleWiener klinische Wochenschrift2021

Covid-19 screening: are forehead temperature measurements during cold outdoor temperatures really helpful?

Cornelius Dzien, Wolfgang Halder, Hannes Winner, Monika Lechleitner

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Wiener klinische Wochenschrift, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Biomedical waste plastic: bacteria, disinfection and recycling technologies-a comprehensive review.International journal of environmental science and technology : IJEST · 2023
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. An Overview of Thermal Infrared Imaging-Based Screenings during Pandemic Emergencies.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Cornelius DzienInternal Medicine, Landeskrankenhaus Hochzirl-Natters, Hochzirl 1, 6170, Zirl, Austria. cornelius.dzien@tirol-kliniken.at.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2759-3155
Wolfgang HalderInternal Medicine, Landeskrankenhaus Hochzirl-Natters, Hochzirl 1, 6170, Zirl, Austria.
Hannes WinnerDepartment of Economics, University of Salzburg, 5010, Salzburg, Austria.
Monika LechleitnerInternal Medicine, Landeskrankenhaus Hochzirl-Natters, Hochzirl 1, 6170, Zirl, Austria.
Landeskrankenhaus Feldkirch · ATUniversity of Salzburg · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBody temperature control is a frequently used screening test for infectious diseases, such as Covid-19 (Sars-CoV-2). We used this procedure to test the body temperature of staff members in a hospital in Tyrol (Austria), where the Covid-19 disease occurred in March 2020. The hospital is located in a mountain area at 995 m above sea level with low outdoor temperatures during early spring season. Under these conditions, we analyzed whether forehead temperature control offers a sufficient screening tool for infectious diseases.

methodsForehead temperature of 101 healthy male and female employees was measured with an infrared thermometer directly after entering the hospital (0 min), followed by further controls after 1 min, 3 min, 5 min and 60 min. We also tracked the outside temperature and the temperature at the entrance hall of the hospital.

resultsComplete data of body temperature were available for 46 female and 46 male study participants. The average forehead temperature measured directly after entrance to the hospital was the lowest (0 min) 33.17 ± 1.45 °C, and increased constantly to 34.90 ± 1.49 °C after 1 min, 35.77 ± 1.10 °C after 3 min, 36.08 ± 0.79 °C after 5 min, and 36.6 ± 0.24 °C after 60 min. The outside temperature ranged between -5.5 °C and 0 °C, the indoor temperature had a constant value of 20.5 °C.

conclusionOur results indicate that forehead infrared temperature control is not an appropriate tool to screen for infectious disease directly at the entrance of a building, at least during early spring season with cold outdoor temperatures.

Indexed as

COVID-19ForeheadAustriaBody TemperatureFemaleFeverHumansMaleSARS-CoV-2TemperatureBody temperatureEntrance screeningFever screeningInfrared thermometerLow outdoor temperatures

Identifiers

PMID33095321
PMCPMC7582437
OpenAlexW3093677640

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.