Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33095318›Full record

ReviewCurrent diabetes reports2020

The Road to Approval: a Perspective on the Role of Icosapent Ethyl in Cardiovascular Risk Reduction.

Xiaowen Wang, Subodh Verma, R Preston Mason, Deepak L Bhatt

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current diabetes reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Xiaowen WangBrigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Subodh VermaUniversity of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
R Preston MasonBrigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Deepak L BhattBrigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA, 02115, USA. DLBhattmd@post.Harvard.edu.
Brigham and Women's Hospital · USHarvard University · USUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewEpidemiological studies have long suggested the cardiovascular benefits of omega-3 fatty acids (OM3FAs). However, until recently, clinical trials using OM3FAs have been largely negative with respect to their cardioprotective effects. In this review, we aim to summarize key clinical trials, examine the clinical benefits of eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and potential mechanisms, and review the changes in guidelines and recommendations. RECENT

findingsThe Reduction of Cardiovascular Events with Icosapent Ethyl-Intervention Trial (REDUCE-IT) has demonstrated significant cardiovascular mortality benefits of purified EPA ethyl ester, with a 25% relative risk reduction in major cardiovascular events. As first of its class to be approved, icosapent ethyl offers a new option to further reduce cardiovascular risks in patients already treated with maximally tolerated statins.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesFatty Acids, Omega-3Eicosapentaenoic AcidHeart Disease Risk FactorsHumansRisk FactorsEicosapentaenoic Acideicosapentaenoic acid ethyl esterFatty Acids, Omega-3CholesterolEicosapentaenoic acidIcosapent ethylTriglyceride

Identifiers

PMID33095318
PMCPMC7584545
OpenAlexW3094072653

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.