Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33095312›Full record

ReviewAbdominal radiology (New York)2022

New frontiers in imaging including radiomics updates for pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms.

Mohammed Saleh, Priya R Bhosale, Motoyo Yano, Malak Itani, Ahmed K Elsayes, Daniel Halperin, Emily K Bergsland, Ajaykumar C Morani

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. PET/MRI imaging in neuroendocrine neoplasm.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2023
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Neuroendocrine neoplasm DFP report.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Mohammed SalehDepartment of Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holocombe Blvd, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Priya R BhosaleDepartment of Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holocombe Blvd, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Motoyo YanoDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic Hospital, Phoenix, AZ, 77030, USA.
Malak ItaniMallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Ahmed K ElsayesDepartment of Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holocombe Blvd, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Daniel HalperinGI Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holocombe Blvd, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Emily K BergslandUniversity of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA.
Ajaykumar C MoraniDepartment of Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holocombe Blvd, Houston, TX, 77030, USA. amorani@mdanderson.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2936-0291
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USMallinckrodt (United States) · USMayo Clinic Hospital · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo illustrate the applications of various imaging tools including conventional MDCT, MRI including DWI, CT & MRI radiomics, FDG & DOTATATE PET-CT for diagnosis, staging, grading, prognostication, treatment planning and assessing treatment response in cases of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (PNENs).

backgroundGastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP NENs) are very diverse clinically & biologically. Their treatment and prognosis depend on staging and primary site, as well as histological grading, the importance of which is also reflected in the recently updated WHO classification of GEP NENs. Grade 3 poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs) are aggressive & nearly always advanced at diagnosis with poor prognosis; whereas Grades-1 and 2 well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) can be quite indolent. Grade 3 well-differentiated NETs represent a new category of neoplasm with an intermediate prognosis. Importantly, the evidence suggest grade heterogeneity can occur within a given tumor and even grade progression can occur over time. Emerging evidence suggests that several non-invasive qualitative and quantitative imaging features on CT, dual-energy CT (DECT), MRI, PET and somatostatin receptor imaging with new tracers, as well as texture analysis, may be useful to grade, prognosticate, and accurately stage primary NENs. Imaging features may also help to inform choice of treatment and follow these neoplasms post-treatment.

conclusionGEP NENs treatment and prognosis depend on the stage as well as histological grade of the tumor. Traditional ways of imaging evaluation for diagnosis and staging does not yet yield sufficient information to replace operative and histological evaluation. Recognition of important qualitative imaging features together with quantitative features and advanced imaging tools including functional imaging with DWI MRI, DOTATATE PET/CT, texture analysis with radiomics and radiogenomic features appear promising for more accurate staging, tumor risk stratification, guiding management and assessing treatment response.

Indexed as

Intestinal NeoplasmsNeuroendocrine TumorsPancreatic NeoplasmsStomach NeoplasmsGallium RadioisotopesHumansPositron-Emission TomographyPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyRadionuclide ImagingRadiopharmaceuticalscopper dotatate CU-64Gallium RadioisotopesRadiopharmaceuticalsNeuroendocrine carcinomaNeuroendocrine tumorQualitative imagingQuantitative imagingRadiomicsTumor grade

Identifiers

PMID33095312
OpenAlexW3094146605

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.