Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33095309›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental monitoring and assessment2020

Health and economic impact of nitrate pollution in drinking water: a Wisconsin case study.

Paul D Mathewson, Sydney Evans, Tyler Byrnes, Anna Joos, Olga V Naidenko

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Emerging pollutants in pharmaceutical and personal care product industrial effluents: Characterization and their environmental impacts.Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Paul D MathewsonClean Wisconsin, 634 W. Main Street, Suite 300, Madison, WI, 53703, USA. pmathewson@cleanwisconsin.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4965-0728
Sydney EvansEnvironmental Working Group, 1436 U Street NW Suite 100, Washington, DC, 20009, USA.
Tyler ByrnesClean Wisconsin, 634 W. Main Street, Suite 300, Madison, WI, 53703, USA.
Anna JoosClean Wisconsin, 634 W. Main Street, Suite 300, Madison, WI, 53703, USA.
Olga V NaidenkoEnvironmental Working Group, 1436 U Street NW Suite 100, Washington, DC, 20009, USA.
Media Working Group · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nitrate contamination of drinking water, common in agricultural areas, increases the risk of certain cancers and impacts fetal development during pregnancy. Building on previously published methodology, this study evaluates nitrate-attributable disease cases and adverse birth outcomes as well as their economic costs for Wisconsin, USA. Nitrate is the most common contaminant in groundwater in Wisconsin. Two-thirds of the state's residents use groundwater as the primary source of drinking water. Here, we analyze nitrate exposure from drinking water in Wisconsin based on nitrate test results for community water systems for the period of 2010-2017 and a novel methodology for estimating nitrate exposure for the 28% of state's residents who use private wells. We estimate that annually, 111-298 combined cases of colorectal, ovarian, thyroid, bladder, and kidney cancer in Wisconsin may be due to nitrate contamination of drinking water. Each year, up to 137-149 cases of very low birth weight, 72-79 cases of very preterm birth, and two cases of neural tube defects could be due to nitrate exposure from drinking water. The direct medical cost estimates for all nitrate-attributable adverse health outcomes range between $23 and $80 million annually. Simulating targeted reductions in the counties with the highest current drinking water nitrate concentrations resulted in similar reductions in adverse health outcomes as statewide reduction efforts, up to nitrate reductions of 20%. Time trend analysis suggests that groundwater nitrate concentrations are overall increasing. Thus, nitrate contamination of water supplies in Wisconsin is a public health problem that needs to be addressed.

Indexed as

Drinking WaterPremature BirthEnvironmental MonitoringFemaleHumansNitratesPregnancyWisconsinDrinking WaterNitratesAdverse birth outcomesCancer riskDrinking waterGroundwaterNitratePrivate wells

Identifiers

PMID33095309
OpenAlexW3093890076

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.