Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33095286›Full record

ArticleCancer chemotherapy and pharmacology2020

Phase 1 study of the HSP90 inhibitor onalespib in combination with AT7519, a pan-CDK inhibitor, in patients with advanced solid tumors.

Khanh T Do, Geraldine O'Sullivan Coyne, John L Hays, Jeffrey G Supko, Stephen V Liu, Kristin Beebe, Len Neckers, Jane B Trepel, Min-Jung Lee, Tomoko Smyth and 9 more

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase I
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Identifying novel SMYD3 interactors on the trail of cancer hallmarks.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Frontiers in oncology · 2022
    Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Khanh T DoDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA. Khanh_Do@dfci.harvard.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-9411-8899
Geraldine O'Sullivan CoyneDivision of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2918-6326
John L HaysThe Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
Jeffrey G SupkoMassachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA.
Stephen V LiuGeorgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA.
Kristin BeebeUrologic Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Len NeckersUrologic Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Jane B TrepelDevelopmental Therapeutics Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Min-Jung LeeDevelopmental Therapeutics Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Tomoko SmythAstex Pharmaceuticals, Cambridge, UK.
Courtney GannonDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
Jennifer HedglinDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
Alona MuzikanskyMassachusetts General Hospital Biostatistics Center, Boston, MA, USA.
Susana CamposDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
John LyonsAstex Pharmaceuticals, Cambridge, UK.
Percy IvyDivision of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
James H DoroshowDivision of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Alice P ChenDivision of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Geoffrey I ShapiroDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
National Cancer Institute · USDana-Farber Cancer Institute · USMassachusetts General Hospital · USGeorgetown University · USThe Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center · US

Funding

XPO1 inhibitors Selinexor and Eltanexor in Combination with Venetoclax and Decitabine (ASTX727) in AMLUM1CA186709 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INST · PI KEITH T FLAHERTY, DONALD W. KUFE · 2014 to 2026
$25.9M
The Johns Hopkins Translational Science Team for the ET-CTNUM1CA186691 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Jan Hendrik Beumer, Michael A Carducci · 2014 to 2026
$21.9M
UM1 Supplement for Early Therapeutic Trials with Phase 2 IntentUM1CA186712 · NCI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI SUSANNE M ARNOLD, WILLIAM E. CARSON · 2014 to 2026
$19.3M
NCI NIH HHS UM1 CA186691NCI NIH HHS UM1 CA186709NCI NIH HHS UM1 CA186712
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe conducted a phase 1 trial of the HSP90 inhibitor onalespib in combination with the CDK inhibitor AT7519, in patients with advanced solid tumors to determine the safety profile and maximally tolerated dose, pharmacokinetics, preliminary antitumor activity, and to assess the pharmacodynamic (PD) effects on HSP70 expression in patient-derived PBMCs and plasma.

methodsThis study followed a 3 + 3 trial design with 1 week of intravenous (IV) onalespib alone, followed by onalespib/AT7519 (IV) on days 1, 4, 8, and 11 of a 21-days cycle. PK and PD samples were collected at baseline, after onalespib alone, and following combination therapy.

resultsTwenty-eight patients were treated with the demonstration of downstream target engagement of HSP70 expression in plasma and PBMCs. The maximally tolerated dose was onalespib 80 mg/m

conclusionsCombined onalespib and AT7519 is tolerable, though below monotherapy RP2D. Promising preliminary clinical activity was seen. Further benefit may be seen with the incorporation of molecular signature pre-selection. Further biomarker development will require the assessment of the on-target impact on relevant client proteins in tumor tissue.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBenzamidesDrug Administration ScheduleFemaleHSP70 Heat-Shock ProteinsHSP90 Heat-Shock ProteinsHumansInfusions, IntravenousIsoindolesMaleMaximum Tolerated DoseMiddle AgedNeoplasmsNeoplasm Staging(2,4-dihydroxy-5-isopropylphenyl)-(5-(4-methylpiperazin-1-ylmethyl)-1,3-dihydroisoindol-2-yl)methanone4-(2,6-dichlorobenzoylamino)-1H-pyrazole-3-carboxylic acid piperidin-4-ylamideBenzamidesHSP70 Heat-Shock ProteinsHSP90 Heat-Shock ProteinsIsoindolesPiperidinesProtein Kinase InhibitorsPyrazolesAKTHeat-shock chaperoneHSP70HSP90

Identifiers

PMID33095286
PMCPMC7954579
OpenAlexW3094012184

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.