ArticleJAMA network open2020
Geographic Variation in Process and Outcomes of Care for Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction in China From 2001 to 2015.
Article in JAMA network open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Diagnostic accuracy, treatment and prognosis of myocardial infarction: an 11-year follow-up of a community-based cohort of 0.5 million Chinese adults.BMJ public health · 2026Article
- Development and validation of a risk score for predicting 30-day mortality in patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Article
- The burden and management competency of cardiomyopathies in China: a nationwide survey study.The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific · 2024Article
- Sex Disparities in Management and Outcomes Among Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome.JAMA network open · 2023Article
- Changes in process and outcome for ST elevation myocardial infarction in central China from 2011 to 2018.Chinese medical journal · 2023Observational
- Report on cardiovascular health and diseases in China 2021: an updated summary.Journal of geriatric cardiology : JGC · 2023 · on this mapArticle
- Trends in care quality in China from 2011 to 2017: An analysis based on the National Specific (Single) Disease Monitoring System.Journal of global health · 2023Article
- Predicting long-term prognosis after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute coronary syndromes: a prospective nested case-control analysis for county-level health services.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Article
- Observational
- Quality indicators for acute cardiovascular diseases: a scoping review.BMC health services research · 2022Article
- Regional variations in the process of care for patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention in Japan.The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific · 2022Article
- Factors Associated With Medical Staff's Engagement and Perception of a Quality Improvement Program for Acute Coronary Syndromes in Hospitals: A Nationally Representative Mixed-Methods Study in China.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2022Article
- A Call to Improve a Chain of Cardiovascular Disease Care.International journal of public health · 2022Article
- The Chasm in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and In-Hospital Mortality Rates Among Acute Myocardial Infarction Patients in Rural and Urban Hospitals in China: A Mediation Analysis.International journal of public health · 2022Article
- Observational
- Changes in ST segment elevation myocardial infarction hospitalisations in China from 2011 to 2015.Open heart · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Variations across regions for managing acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in China are little understood. Objective: To evaluate geographic variation and its change with time in treatment process and outcomes for patients with AMI. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study used data from the Patient-Centered Evaluative Assessment of Cardiac Events-Retrospective AMI project in 2001, 2006, 2011, and 2015 in 153 randomly selected hospitals across China. Patients were hospitalized for AMI. Data were analyzed from October 1 to October 31, 2019. Exposures: Hospitalization in 3 geographic regions (Eastern, Central, and Western) stratified according to China's official definition. Main Outcomes and Measures: Process of care measures included reperfusion therapies, aspirin, clopidogrel, β-blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers, and statins. Therapy use was analyzed among patients who were clinically eligible without contraindications (considered as ideal candidates for treatments). Outcome measures included in-hospital mortality and 5-day mortality. Mixed models were used to assess the regional disparities and time-region interactions in those measures, adjusting for patient characteristics. Results: In 153 hospitals across China, 27 046 patient hospitalizations for AMI were sampled. There was a significant difference across regions in process of care and the odds ratio (OR) of delivering any 1 of the 6 treatments to an ideal patient was 0.83 (95% CI, 0.76-0.91; P < .001) for the lowest region compared with the highest region. The variation between the 2 higher regions narrowed (time-by-Eastern region interaction: OR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.76-0.91; P < .001). The region with the highest in-hospital mortality had 1.46 times greater in-hospital mortality (95% CI, 1.07-2.00; P < .001) than the lowest region and the region with the highest 5-day mortality had 1.52 times greater 5-day mortality (95% CI, 1.09-2.11; P = .04) than the lowest region. The geographic variation in mortality did not change over time. Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, significant geographic variations in process of care and outcomes were found to persist in China; further targeted and region-based approaches to AMI management are warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.