ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2020
Clinical Context-Aware Biomedical Text Summarization Using Deep Neural Network: Model Development and Validation.
Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- A systematic review of automatic text summarization for biomedical literature and EHRs.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2021Pooled it
- Data extraction methods for systematic review (semi)automation: Update of a living systematic review.F1000Research · 2021Pooled it
- Increasing Women's Knowledge about HPV Using BERT Text Summarization: An Online Randomized Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Trial
- Automated Brief Hospital Course Summarization in Cardiac Surgery Using a Lightweight Large Language Model-Based Framework: Development and Evaluation Study on the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care-IV.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Systematic assessment of text summarization methods for biomedical literature from frequency methods to language models.iScience · 2026Article
- A systematic evaluation and benchmarking of text summarization methods for biomedical literature: From word-frequency methods to language models.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- The landscape of artificial intelligence tools and platforms for evidence synthesis: a scoping review.Systematic reviews · 2026Article
- Assessing the Role of Large Language Models Between ChatGPT and DeepSeek in Asthma Education for Bilingual Individuals: Comparative Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2025Article
- Applications of deep learning in intracranial aneurysm imaging: A scoping review of detection, risk prediction, and emerging prognostic models.Current journal of neurology · 2025Review
- Accuracy of smartwatches in predicting distance running performance.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2025Article
- Techniques for learning and transferring knowledge for microbiome-based classification and prediction: review and assessment.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Review
- The McMaster Health Information Research Unit: Over a Quarter-Century of Health Informatics Supporting Evidence-Based Medicine.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Article
- Exploring the Efficacy of Large Language Models in Summarizing Mental Health Counseling Sessions: Benchmark Study.JMIR mental health · 2024Article
- Predicting blood-brain barrier permeability of molecules with a large language model and machine learning.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Comparing generative and extractive approaches to information extraction from abstracts describing randomized clinical trials.Journal of biomedical semantics · 2024Article
- Information Capsule: A New Approach for Summarizing Medical Information.International journal of preventive medicine · 2024Article
- Initial Development of an Automated Platform for Assessing Trainee Performance on Case Presentations.ATS scholar · 2022Article
- Medical Text Simplification Using Reinforcement Learning (TESLEA): Deep Learning-Based Text Simplification Approach.JMIR medical informatics · 2022Article
- Anticipating Ambulatory Automation: Potential Applications of Administrative and Clinical Automation in Outpatient Healthcare Delivery.Applied clinical informatics · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAutomatic text summarization (ATS) enables users to retrieve meaningful evidence from big data of biomedical repositories to make complex clinical decisions. Deep neural and recurrent networks outperform traditional machine-learning techniques in areas of natural language processing and computer vision; however, they are yet to be explored in the ATS domain, particularly for medical text summarization.
objectiveTraditional approaches in ATS for biomedical text suffer from fundamental issues such as an inability to capture clinical context, quality of evidence, and purpose-driven selection of passages for the summary. We aimed to circumvent these limitations through achieving precise, succinct, and coherent information extraction from credible published biomedical resources, and to construct a simplified summary containing the most informative content that can offer a review particular to clinical needs.
methodsIn our proposed approach, we introduce a novel framework, termed Biomed-Summarizer, that provides quality-aware Patient/Problem, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcome (PICO)-based intelligent and context-enabled summarization of biomedical text. Biomed-Summarizer integrates the prognosis quality recognition model with a clinical context-aware model to locate text sequences in the body of a biomedical article for use in the final summary. First, we developed a deep neural network binary classifier for quality recognition to acquire scientifically sound studies and filter out others. Second, we developed a bidirectional long-short term memory recurrent neural network as a clinical context-aware classifier, which was trained on semantically enriched features generated using a word-embedding tokenizer for identification of meaningful sentences representing PICO text sequences. Third, we calculated the similarity between query and PICO text sequences using Jaccard similarity with semantic enrichments, where the semantic enrichments are obtained using medical ontologies. Last, we generated a representative summary from the high-scoring PICO sequences aggregated by study type, publication credibility, and freshness score.
resultsEvaluation of the prognosis quality recognition model using a large dataset of biomedical literature related to intracranial aneurysm showed an accuracy of 95.41% (2562/2686) in terms of recognizing quality articles. The clinical context-aware multiclass classifier outperformed the traditional machine-learning algorithms, including support vector machine, gradient boosted tree, linear regression, K-nearest neighbor, and naïve Bayes, by achieving 93% (16127/17341) accuracy for classifying five categories: aim, population, intervention, results, and outcome. The semantic similarity algorithm achieved a significant Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.61 (0-1 scale) on a well-known BIOSSES dataset (with 100 pair sentences) after semantic enrichment, representing an improvement of 8.9% over baseline Jaccard similarity. Finally, we found a highly positive correlation among the evaluations performed by three domain experts concerning different metrics, suggesting that the automated summarization is satisfactory.
conclusionsBy employing the proposed method Biomed-Summarizer, high accuracy in ATS was achieved, enabling seamless curation of research evidence from the biomedical literature to use for clinical decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.