Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33095113›Full record

Observational studyGut microbes2020

Influence of probiotic supplementation on the developing microbiota in human preterm neonates.

Niels van Best, Sonja Trepels-Kottek, Paul Savelkoul, Thorsten Orlikowsky, Mathias W Hornef, John Penders

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Gut microbes, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Gut Microbial Topology and Metabolic Signatures Associated With Colorectal Neoplasia.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Early-life microbiota-immune homeostasis.Frontiers in immunology · 2023
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. [Development and Influencing Factors of Oral Microbiota in Early Life].Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition · 2022
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Niels van BestInstitute of Medical Microbiology, RWTH University Hospital Aachen, RWTH University Aachen , Aachen, Germany.
Sonja Trepels-KottekSection of Neonatology, University Children's Hospital , Aachen, Germany.
Paul SavelkoulDepartment of Medical Microbiology, School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism (NUTRIM), Maastricht University , Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Thorsten OrlikowskySection of Neonatology, University Children's Hospital , Aachen, Germany.
Mathias W HornefInstitute of Medical Microbiology, RWTH University Hospital Aachen, RWTH University Aachen , Aachen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6096-9110
John PendersDepartment of Medical Microbiology, School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism (NUTRIM), Maastricht University , Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9146-5919
Maastricht University · NLUniversitätsklinikum Aachen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOral administration of probiotic bacteria to preterm neonates has been recommended to prevent the development of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC). The influence of probiotics on the endogenous microbiome, however, has remained incompletely understood. STUDY DESIGN &

methodsHere, we performed an observational study including 80 preterm neonates born at a gestational age <32-weeks to characterize the persistence of probiotic bacteria after no treatment or oral administration of two different probiotic formula and their influence on the microbial ecosystem during and after the intervention and their association with the development of NEC. Weekly fecal samples were profiled by 16S rRNA sequencing and monitored for the presence of the probiotic bacteria by quantitative PCR.

resultsMicrobiota profiles differed significantly between the control group and both probiotic groups. Probiotic supplementation was associated with lower temporal variation as well as higher relative abundance of

conclusionOur results demonstrate successful transient colonization by probiotic bacteria and a significant influence on the endogenous microbiota with a reduced abundance of bacterial taxa associated with the development of NEC. These results emphasize that probiotic supplementation may allow targeted manipulation of the enteric microbiota and confer a clinical benefit. (Clinical Trial Registry accession number: DRKS/GCTR 00021034).

Indexed as

Dietary SupplementsBacteriaEnterocolitis, NecrotizingFecesGastrointestinal MicrobiomeGestational AgeHumansInfantInfant, NewbornInfant, Newborn, DiseasesInfant, PrematureLongitudinal StudiesProbioticsenteric microbiotanecrotizing enterocolitispathobiontpretermprobiotic supplementation

Identifiers

PMID33095113
PMCPMC7588225
OpenAlexW3093580810

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.