ArticleThe CRISPR journal2020
Article in The CRISPR journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A LGR5 reporter pig model closely resembles human intestine for improved study of stem cells in disease.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2023Article
- Ontogeny of cellular organization and LGR5 expression in porcine cochlea revealed using tissue clearing and 3D imaging.iScience · 2022Article
- Use of Translational, Genetically Modified Porcine Models to Ultimately Improve Intestinal Disease Treatment.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The use of CRISPR-Cas and RNA-guided endonucleases has drastically changed research strategies for understanding and exploiting gene function, particularly for the generation of gene-edited animal models. This has resulted in an explosion in the number of gene-edited species, including highly biomedically relevant pig models. However, even with error-free DNA insertion or deletion, edited genes are occasionally not expressed and/or translated as expected. Therefore, there is a need to validate the expression outcomes gene modifications
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.