Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33095045›Full record

ReviewThe CRISPR journal2020

CRISPR-Cas Activators for Engineering Gene Expression in Higher Eukaryotes.

J Armando Casas-Mollano, Matthew H Zinselmeier, Samuel E Erickson, Michael J Smanski

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The CRISPR journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. CRISPR-Cas9-Guided Genetic Manipulation of Patient-Derived Brain Tumor Cells.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Establishment and application of an RNAi system inFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

J Armando Casas-MollanoDepartment of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology, and Biophysics, BioTechnology Institute, University of Minnesota, Twin-Cities, Saint Paul, Minnesota, USA; and Cell Biology, and Development, University of Minnesota, Twin-Cities, Saint Paul, Minnesota, USA.
Matthew H ZinselmeierDepartment of Genetics, Cell Biology, and Development, University of Minnesota, Twin-Cities, Saint Paul, Minnesota, USA.
Samuel E EricksonDepartment of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology, and Biophysics, BioTechnology Institute, University of Minnesota, Twin-Cities, Saint Paul, Minnesota, USA; and Cell Biology, and Development, University of Minnesota, Twin-Cities, Saint Paul, Minnesota, USA.
Michael J SmanskiDepartment of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology, and Biophysics, BioTechnology Institute, University of Minnesota, Twin-Cities, Saint Paul, Minnesota, USA; and Cell Biology, and Development, University of Minnesota, Twin-Cities, Saint Paul, Minnesota, USA.
Biotechnology Institute · USUniversity of Minnesota · US

Funding

TRAINING FOR FUTURE BIOTECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENTT32GM008347 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI SCHMIDT-DANNERT, CLAUDIA · 1990 to 2021
$11.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008347
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

CRISPR-Cas-based transcriptional activators allow genetic engineers to specifically induce expression of one or many target genes

Indexed as

CRISPR-Cas SystemsTranscriptional ActivationAnimalsGene EditingGene ExpressionHumansPlantsTrans-ActivatorsYeastsTrans-Activators

Identifiers

PMID33095045
PMCPMC7580621
OpenAlexW3094486315

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.