Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33094945›Full record

Observational studyThe American journal of managed care2020

Inpatient-outpatient shared electronic health records: telemedicine and laboratory follow-up after hospital discharge.

Mary Reed, Jie Huang, Richard Brand, Ilana Graetz, Marc G Jaffe, Dustin Ballard, Romain Neugebauer, Bruce Fireman, John Hsu

Open access · greenAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in The American journal of managed care, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Enhancing healthcare access for an older population: The age-friendly emergency department.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mary ReedKaiser Permanente Division of Research, 2000 Broadway, Oakland, CA 94612. Email: Mary.E.Reed@kp.org.
Jie Huang
Richard Brand
Ilana Graetz
Marc G Jaffe
Dustin Ballard
Romain Neugebauer
Bruce Fireman
John Hsu
Kaiser Permanente · US

Funding

Impact of Integrated Patient-Facing Health IT Tools on Quality and Resource Use for Patients with DiabetesR01DK085070 · NIDDK · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI REED, MARY · 2010 to 2019
$4.4M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK085070
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesContinuity of patient information across settings can improve transitions after hospital discharge, but outpatient clinicians often have limited access to complete information from recent hospitalizations. We examined whether providers' timely access to clinical information through shared inpatient-outpatient electronic health records (EHRs) was associated with follow-up visits, return emergency department (ED) visits, or readmissions after hospital discharge in patients with diabetes. STUDY

designStepped-wedge observational study.

methodsAs an integrated delivery system staggered implementation of a shared inpatient-outpatient EHR, we studied 241,510 hospital discharges in patients with diabetes (2005-2011), examining rates of outpatient follow-up office visits, telemedicine (phone visits and asynchronous secure messages), laboratory tests, and return ED visits or readmissions (as adverse events). We used multivariate logistic regression adjusting for time trends, patient characteristics, and medical center and accounting for patient clustering to calculate adjusted follow-up rates.

resultsFor patients with diabetes, provider use of a shared inpatient-outpatient EHR was associated with a statistically significant shift toward follow-up delivered through a combination of telemedicine and outpatient laboratory tests, without a traditional in-person visit (from 22.9% with an outpatient-only EHR to 27.0% with a shared inpatient-outpatient EHR; P < .05). We found no statistically significant differences in 30-day return ED visits (odds ratio, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.96-1.09) or readmissions (odds ratio, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.91-1.06) with the shared EHR compared with the outpatient-only EHR.

conclusionsReal-time clinical information availability during transitions between health care settings, along with robust telemedicine access, may shift the method of care delivery without adversely affecting patient health outcomes. Efforts to expand interoperability and information exchange may support follow-up care efficiency.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health Care, IntegratedElectronic Health RecordsTelemedicineEmergency Service, HospitalFollow-Up StudiesHospitalsHumansInpatientsLaboratoriesOutpatientsPatient Discharge

Identifiers

PMID33094945
PMCPMC11594565
OpenAlexW3093750384

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.