Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33094846›Full record

ArticleHealth services research2020

Racial and ethnic disparities in care for health system-affiliated physician organizations and non-affiliated physician organizations.

Justin W Timbie, Ashley M Kranz, Maria DeYoreo, Blen Eshete-Roesler, Marc N Elliott, José J Escarce, Mark E Totten, Cheryl L Damberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health services research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Making integration work.Health services research · 2020
    Article
  15. The promise and peril of health systems.Health services research · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Justin W TimbieRAND, Arlington, Virginia, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9955-5270
Ashley M KranzRAND, Arlington, Virginia, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0507-7800
Maria DeYoreoRAND, Santa Monica, California, USA.
Blen Eshete-RoeslerRAND, Santa Monica, California, USA.
Marc N ElliottRAND, Santa Monica, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7147-5535
José J EscarceDavid Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA and UCLA Fielding School of Public Health, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Mark E TottenRAND, Santa Monica, California, USA.
Cheryl L DambergRAND, Santa Monica, California, USA.

Funding

Understanding Health Care Delivery Systems PCOR Adoption and System PerformanceU19HS024067 · AHRQ · RAND CORPORATION · PI DAMBERG, CHERYL · 2015 to 2019
$17.4M
AHRQ HHS U19 HS024067
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess racial and ethnic disparities in care for Medicare fee-for-service (FFS) beneficiaries and whether disparities differ between health system-affiliated physician organizations (POs) and nonaffiliated POs. DATA SOURCES: We used Medicare Data on Provider Practice and Specialty (MD-PPAS), Medicare Provider Enrollment, Chain, and Ownership System (PECOS), IRS Form 990, 100% Medicare FFS claims, and race/ethnicity estimated using the Medicare Bayesian Improved Surname Geocoding 2.0 algorithm. STUDY

designUsing a sample of 16 007 POs providing primary care in 2015, we assessed racial/ethnic disparities on 12 measures derived from claims (2 cancer screenings; diabetic eye examinations; continuity of care; two medication adherence measures; three measures of follow-up visits after acute care; all-cause emergency department (ED) visits, all-cause readmissions, and ambulatory care-sensitive admissions). We decomposed these "total" disparities into within-PO and between-PO components using models with PO random effects. We then pair-matched 1853 of these POs that were affiliated with health systems to similar nonaffiliated POs. We examined differences in within-PO disparities by affiliation status by interacting each nonwhite race/ethnicity with an affiliation indicator. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION

methodsMedicare Data on Provider Practice and Specialty identified POs billing Medicare; PECOS and IRS Form 990 identified health system affiliations. Beneficiaries age 18 and older were attributed to POs using a plurality visit rule. PRINCIPAL

findingsWe observed total disparities in 12 of 36 comparisons between white and nonwhite beneficiaries; nonwhites received worse care in 10. Within-PO disparities exceeded between-PO disparities and were substantively important (>=5 percentage points or>=0.2 standardized differences) in nine of the 12 comparisons. Among these 12, nonaffiliated POs had smaller disparities than affiliated POs in two comparisons (P < .05): 1.6 percentage points smaller black-white disparities in follow-up after ED visits and 0.6 percentage points smaller Hispanic-white disparities in breast cancer screening.

conclusionsWe find no evidence that system-affiliated POs have smaller racial and ethnic disparities than nonaffiliated POs. Where differences existed, disparities were slightly larger in affiliated POs.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overCross-Sectional StudiesDelivery of Health Care, IntegratedEthnicityFee-for-Service PlansFemaleGroup PracticeHealthcare DisparitiesHealth Services ResearchHumansMaleMedicaidMedicareMiddle AgedPrimary Health Caredelivery of health carehealth care disparitiesprimary health carequality of health carerace factors

Identifiers

PMID33094846
PMCPMC7720702

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.