Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33094734›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2020

Digital Self-Management in Support of Patients Living With Chronic Pain: Feasibility Pilot Study.

Katrine Bostrøm, Elin Børøsund, Cecilie Varsi, Hilde Eide, Elise Flakk Nordang, Karlein Mg Schreurs, Lori B Waxenberg, Karen E Weiss, Eleshia J Morrison, Milada Cvancarova Småstuen and 2 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03705104 (Living Well with Chronic Pain), which is not on this map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03705104 naactive not recruitingnot on this map

Living Well with Chronic Pain: Using Person-centered E-health Design to Support Self-management

TypeinterventionalSponsorOslo University HospitalRan2019 to 2030Enrolled340ConditionsChronic Pain, WidespreadArmsEPIO
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Musculoskeletal Pain: Current and Future Directions of Physical Therapy Practice.Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Katrine BostrømDepartment of Digital Health Research, Division of Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3673-8694
Elin BørøsundDepartment of Digital Health Research, Division of Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3897-7055
Cecilie VarsiDepartment of Digital Health Research, Division of Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5257-7993
Hilde EideDepartment of Digital Health Research, Division of Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4428-5047
Elise Flakk NordangDepartment of Digital Health Research, Division of Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4439-8984
Karlein Mg SchreursDepartment of Psychology, Health & Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1229-0151
Lori B WaxenbergDepartment of Clinical and Health Psychology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4987-8503
Karen E WeissDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6576-0615
Eleshia J MorrisonDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychology, College of Medicine and Science, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2872-943X
Milada Cvancarova SmåstuenFaculty of Health Sciences, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8947-8649
Audun StubhaugInstitute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0606-8001
Lise Solberg NesDepartment of Digital Health Research, Division of Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9261-0871

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChronic pain can be complex and taxing to live with, and treatment and support require a multicomponent approach, which may not always be offered or available. Smartphones, tablets, and personal computers are already incorporated into patients' daily lives, and therefore, they can be used to communicate, educate, and support self-management. Although some web-based self-management interventions exist, research examining the evidence and effect of digital solutions supporting self-management for patients living with chronic pain is limited, findings are inconclusive, and new innovative ideas and solutions are needed.

objectiveThis feasibility pilot study aimed to explore the system use, perceived usefulness, ease of use, and preliminary effects of EPIO, an app-based cognitive-behavioral pain self-management intervention program for patients living with chronic pain.

methodsThe EPIO intervention was delivered in a blended-care model containing (1) one face-to-face introduction session, (2) nine cognitive behavior-based pain self-management modules, delivered in an app-based format for smartphones or tablets, and (3) one follow-up phone call at 2 to 3 weeks after the introduction session. Patients living with chronic pain (N=50) completed pre-post outcome measures at baseline and 3 months after the introduction session, with registration of system use (ie, log data) until 6 months. The use, perceived usefulness, and ease of use of the EPIO program were examined through system use data, as well as a study-specific use/usability questionnaire and the System Usability Scale (SUS). Outcome measures to test feasibility of use and estimate preliminary effects included the Brief Pain Inventory, health-related quality of life (HRQoL) scale, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Self-Regulatory Fatigue scale, Pain Catastrophizing Scale, and Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire.

resultsParticipants (N=50) had a median age of 52 years (range 29-74 years) at inclusion and were mainly female (40/50, 80%). Thirty-one participants completed at least six of the nine modules within the 3-month study period (62% completion rate). Forty-five participants completed outcome measures at 3 months, and the EPIO program was rated as useful (ie, "totally agree" or "agree"; 39/45, 87%) and easy to use (42/45, 93%), and as having easily understandable exercises (44/45, 98%). The average overall system usability (SUS) score was 85.7, indicating grade A and excellent system usability. Preliminary psychosocial outcome measure estimates showed primarily nonsignificant pre-post intervention improvements at 3 months, but with significant positive effects related to some aspects of HRQoL (bodily pain, P=.02 and change, P=.049).

conclusionsDigital self-management intervention programs may be of use and support for patients living with chronic pain. In this feasibility study, EPIO showed an acceptable program completion rate and was rated as useful and easy to use, with excellent user satisfaction. Program optimization and efficacy testing in a large-scale randomized controlled trial are warranted and in progress.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT03705104; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03705104.

Indexed as

acceptabilitychronic paincognitive-behavioral paindigitaleHealthfeasibilityself-managementusabilityuser centered

Identifiers

PMID33094734
PMCPMC7647816

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.