ArticleJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology2022
Assessment of left and right ventricular functional parameters using dynamic dual-tracer [
Article in Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Value of PET ECG gating in a cross-validation study of cardiac function assessment by PET/MR imaging.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2023Article
- Impact of ECG gating methods on the assessment of left ventricular cardiac function using PET/MRI.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2023Article
- Potential novel imaging targets of inflammation in cardiac sarcoidosis.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2022Review
- First-pass cardiac PET: Potentiality and limitations.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
11 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCardiac positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (PET/MRI) can assess various cardiovascular diseases. In this study, we intra-individually compared right (RV) and left ventricular (LV) parameters obtained from dual-tracer PET/MRI scan.
methodsIn 22 patients with coronary heart disease (69 ± 9 years) dynamic [
resultsRVFPEF and LVFPEF from FDG and NH
conclusionsDeriving LV and RV functional values from various phases of dynamic NH
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.