ArticleIrish journal of medical science2021
Five things I wish I had known when I became a consultant.
Article in Irish journal of medical science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo report the advice consultants wish they had received on their appointment and to see if that advice differs by gender, or length of time since appointment.
methodsAn anonymous survey of consultants was undertaken through the alumni offices of the Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, the Royal College of Physicians of Ireland and the College of Anaesthesiologists of Ireland. A link to a Qualtrics survey was sent and consultants were asked to list the five pieces of advice they wish they had been told on appointment. Free text boxes without limits were used. The responses were analysed and themes identified and subjected to statistical analysis.
resultsA total of 379 consultants responded. The top five pieces of advice were, in order, self-care, work-life balance, relationships with colleagues, teamwork and continuous education. There was a majority of male respondents (60%) and just over 60% of respondents had more than ten years' experience as a consultant. Gender analysis showed that only one of the top five categories-continuous education-demonstrated a significant difference between male and female respondents (p < .001). Self-care was significantly less likely (p < .04) to feature as advice given in those more than twenty years a consultant. Females were significantly more likely to advise learning to 'say no' than males (p < .001). More males had responses in relation to 'financial advice' (p = .002) and 'teaching' (p = .04) compared to females.
conclusionThe emergence of 'self-care' and 'work-life balance' as the top pieces of advice suggests that consultants regret that they have not looked after their health. The fact that 'self-care' was significantly less likely to feature among consultants more than twenty years in practice may point to generational differences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33094467What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.