Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33094366›Full record

ArticleUpdates in surgery2021

ERAS pathway in colorectal surgery: structured implementation program and high adherence for improved outcomes.

Marco Catarci, Michele Benedetti, Angela Maurizi, Francesco Spinelli, Tonino Bernacconi, Gianluca Guercioni, Roberto Campagnacci

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Updates in surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Enhanced recovery after surgery protocols following emergency intra-abdominal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Marco CatarciGeneral Surgery Unit, Ospedale C.G. Mazzoni Ascoli Piceno, AV 5, Azienda Sanitaria Unica Regionale (ASUR), Marche, Italy. marco.catarci@sanita.marche.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6338-0114
Michele BenedettiGeneral Surgery Unit, Ospedale C.G. Mazzoni Ascoli Piceno, AV 5, Azienda Sanitaria Unica Regionale (ASUR), Marche, Italy.
Angela MauriziGeneral Surgery Unit, Ospedale C. Urbani Jesi (AN), AV 2, Azienda Sanitaria Unica Regionale (ASUR), Marche, Italy.
Francesco SpinelliAnesthesiology Unit, Ospedale C.G. Mazzoni Ascoli Piceno, AV 5, Azienda Sanitaria Unica Regionale (ASUR), Marche, Italy.
Tonino BernacconiAnesthesiology Unit, Ospedale C. Urbani Jesi (AN), AV 2, Azienda Sanitaria Unica Regionale (ASUR), Marche, Italy.
Gianluca GuercioniGeneral Surgery Unit, Ospedale C.G. Mazzoni Ascoli Piceno, AV 5, Azienda Sanitaria Unica Regionale (ASUR), Marche, Italy.
Roberto CampagnacciGeneral Surgery Unit, Ospedale C. Urbani Jesi (AN), AV 2, Azienda Sanitaria Unica Regionale (ASUR), Marche, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although there is clear evidence that an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) program in colorectal surgery leads to significantly reduced morbidity rates and length of hospital stay (LOS), it is still unclear what modalities and levels of implementation of the program are necessary to achieve these results. The purpose of this study is to analyze the methods and results of the first year of structured implementation of a colorectal ERAS program in two surgical units of the Azienda Sanitaria Unica Regionale (ASUR) Marche in Italy. A two-center observational study on a prospectively maintained database was performed on 196 consecutive colorectal resections (excluding emergencies and American Society of Anesthesiologists class > III cases) over a 1-year period. More than 50 variables including adherence to the individual items of the ERAS program were considered. Primary outcomes were overall morbidity, major morbidity, mortality and anastomotic leakage rates; secondary outcomes were LOS, re-admission and re-operation. The results were evaluated by univariate and multivariate analyses through logistic regression. After a median follow-up of 39.5 days, we recorded complications in 72 patients (overall morbidity 36.7%), major complications in 14 patients (major morbidity 7.1%), 6 deaths (mortality 3.1%), anastomotic dehiscence in 9 cases (4.9%), mean overall LOS of 6.6 days, 10 readmissions (5.1%) and 13 reoperations (6.7%). The mean adherence rate to the items of the ERAS program was 85.4%, showing a significant dose-effect curve for overall and major morbidity rates, anastomotic leakage rates and LOS. The implementation methods of a colorectal ERAS program in this study led to a high adherence (> 80%) to the program items. High adherence had significant effects also on major morbidity and anastomotic leakage rates.

Indexed as

Critical PathwaysEnhanced Recovery After SurgeryAgedAged, 80 and overAnastomotic LeakColonColonic DiseasesColorectal SurgeryDigestive System Surgical ProceduresFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLength of StayMaleRectal DiseasesRectumAnastomotic leakageColorectal surgeryComplianceERASMajor morbidity

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.