Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33094356›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2021

The utilization of allied and community health services by cancer patients living in regional and remote geographical areas in Australia.

Darshit Rajeshkumar Parikh, Abbey Diaz, Christina Bernardes, Paolo B De Ieso, Thanuja Thachil, Giam Kar, Matthew Stevens, Gail Garvey

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Indigenous Australians' Experiences of Cancer Care: A Narrative Literature Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Darshit Rajeshkumar ParikhSchool of Psychological and Clinical Sciences, Charles Darwin University, The Northern, Territory, Darwin, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0136-3749
Abbey DiazWellbeing and Preventable Chronic Diseases Division, Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, The Northern Territory, Darwin, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8637-311X
Christina BernardesQIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8061-7013
Paolo B De IesoIcon Cancer Centre Richmond, Richmond, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9063-6058
Thanuja ThachilBallarat Austin Radiation Oncology Centre, Central, Ballarat, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0345-3924
Giam KarAlan Walker Cancer Care Centre, Royal Darwin Hospital, Tiwi, The Northern Territory, Darwin, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4633-5514
Matthew StevensWellbeing and Preventable Chronic Diseases Division, Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, The Northern Territory, Darwin, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7491-7669
Gail GarveyWellbeing and Preventable Chronic Diseases Division, Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, The Northern Territory, Darwin, Australia. gail.garvey@menzies.edu.au.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5065-5716
Charles Darwin University · AUBallarat Health Services · AUQIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute · AURoyal Darwin Hospital · AU

Funding

National Health and Medical Research Council 1041111National Health and Medical Research Council 1153027National Health and Medical Research Council 1176651
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCancer patients in Australia's Northern Territory (NT) face unique challenges to accessing cancer-related community and allied health services (referred here as 'health services'). This is in part due to the NT's unique geographic, socioeconomic and demographic profile. This paper describes the use of health services by cancer patients in the NT.

methodsAdult cancer patients attending appointments at a cancer centre in Darwin, NT and who were diagnosed within the past five years were invited to participate in face-to-face interviews about their use of allied and community health services. A descriptive analysis of health services utilization was conducted.

resultsOf the 76 participants interviewed, 63% identified as non-Indigenous, 53% female and 45% lived in very remote areas. Mean age at interview was 58.7 years (SD 13.2). Overall, 82% of participants utilized at least one health service since their cancer diagnosis. All Indigenous participants used at least one service, while 28% of non-Indigenous participants did not use any health service. The services most frequently used by participants were community services (42%) and information sources (40%).

conclusionThe findings from this study suggest there is variation in the type of community and allied health services used by NT cancer patients across clinical and demographic groups (including Indigenous status). Further qualitative enquiry is needed to better understand this variation, which may reflect differences in service preference, accessibility, health literacy of patients or patient engagement. Such knowledge may inform service delivery improvements to better support cancer patients through their cancer care pathway.

Indexed as

AustraliaCommunity Health ServicesFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHumansMaleMiddle AgedAustraliaCancerHealth service useIndigenousRemote

Identifiers

PMID33094356
OpenAlexW3094329950

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.