Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33094241›Full record

ArticleFuture healthcare journal2020

Improving care planning and communication for frail older persons across the primary-secondary care interface.

Uruakanwa Ekwegh, John Dean

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Future healthcare journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Uruakanwa EkweghEast Lancashire Hospitals NHS Trust, Blackburn, UK.
John DeanEast Lancashire Hospitals NHS Trust, Blackburn, UK.
East Lancashire Hospitals NHS Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Collaboration between general practitioners (GPs) and geriatricians should be at the forefront of the design and delivery of the care of frail older people. Primary care teams require high-quality, relevant and timely communication around assessment and care plans when patients return home from secondary care settings. The aim of this project was to develop effective handover communication between the frailty team and primary care for patients assessed and transferred home from an emergency department. The 'frailty letter to the GP' was designed, tested and adapted to accomplish this aim. This involved two PDSA (plan, do, study, act) cycles through which the letter was tested and adapted. Our measure of improvement was GPs' satisfaction with the letter with regards to its usefulness. Based on feedback, the letter was edited to reflect what the GPs needed in order to continue their patients' care. Joint planning with the clinical commissioning group GP leads, as well as the trust's transformation lead, was crucial to the final design of the letter that was well received by the GP colleagues. Local departments should examine current communication mechanisms for these patients, and, if found lacking, work collaboratively to improve these while also tracking relevant clinical outcomes.

Indexed as

Collaborationcommunicationfrailtyhandover

Identifiers

PMID33094241
PMCPMC7571748
OpenAlexW3093442110

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.