Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33094190›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of bioprinting2017

Directed self-assembly software for single cell deposition.

Samuel C Sklare, Winona L Richey, Benjamin T Vinson, Douglas B Chrisey

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of bioprinting, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Machine learning boosts three-dimensional bioprinting.International journal of bioprinting · 2023
    Review
  2. IJB is on its way to Science Citation Index.International journal of bioprinting · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Samuel C SklareDepartment of Physics and Engineering Physics, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA, 70118, United States of America.
Winona L RicheyDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA, 70118, United States of America.
Benjamin T VinsonBioinnovation Program, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA, 70118, United States of America.
Douglas B ChriseyDepartment of Physics and Engineering Physics, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA, 70118, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Laser direct-write (LDW) bioprinting methods offer a diverse set of tools to design experiments, fabricate tissue constructs and to cellular microenvironments all in a CAD/CAM manner. To date, we have just scratched the surface of the system's potential and for LDW to be utilized to its fullest, there are many distinct hardware and software components that must be integrated and communicate seamlessly. In this perspective article, we detail the development of novel graphical user interface (GUI) software to improve LDW capability and functionality. The main modules in the control software correspond to cell transfer, microbead fabrication, and micromachining. The modules make the control of each of these features, and the management of printing programs that utilize one or more features, to be facile. The software also addresses problems related to construct scale-up, print speed, experimental conditions, and management of sensor data. The control software and possibilities for integrated sensor data are presented.

Indexed as

CAD/CAM bioprintingGUI softwarelaser direct-writemachine learningsingle-cell printing

Identifiers

PMID33094190
PMCPMC7575622

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.