ArticleSurgical neurology international2020
Reperfusion Injury (RPI)/White Cord Syndrome (WCS) Due to Cervical Spine Surgery: A Diagnosis of Exclusion.
Article in Surgical neurology international, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- "White Cord Syndrome": A Reperfusion Injury Following Laminectomy and Spinal Decompression Surgery-A Case Report and Literature Review.Case reports in medicine · 2026Article
- Updated review of cervical white cord syndrome (WCS)/reperfusion injury (RI); A "diagnosis of inclusion" requiring magnetic resonance (MR) confirmation, not just a "clinical diagnosis".Surgical neurology international · 2025Review
- White Cord Syndrome Following Cervical Surgery in a Patient With Klippel-Feil Syndrome: A Case Report.Cureus · 2024Article
- Article
- Case report: Medulla oblongata and cervical cord reperfusion injury after intracranial vertebral artery angioplasty and stenting.Frontiers in neurology · 2023Article
- Late‑onset white cord syndrome following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: A case report.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2023Article
- Letter to the Editor: Commentary on White Cord Syndrome: A Reperfusion Injury Following Spinal Decompression Surgery (Korean journal of neurotrauma · 2022Article
- White Cord Syndrome: A Reperfusion Injury Following Spinal Decompression Surgery.Korean journal of neurotrauma · 2022Article
- Authors' Reply to Letter to the Editor: Commentary on White Cord Syndrome: A Reperfusion Injury Following Spinal Decompression Surgery (Korean journal of neurotrauma · 2022Article
- Article
- White cord syndrome following posterior decompression and fusion for severe OPLL and an acute traumatic cervical injury - A case report and review of literature.Surgical neurology international · 2022Article
- Misdiagnosis of "White Cord Syndrome" following posterior cervical surgery for ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: A case report.Surgical neurology international · 2021Article
- Medicolegal corner (spine): Contraindicated use of DuraSeal in anterior cervical spine led to quadriplegia.Surgical neurology international · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFollowing acute cervical spinal cord decompression, a subset of patients may develop acute postoperative paralysis due to Reperfusion Injury (RPI)/White Cord Syndrome (WCS). Pathophysiologically, this occurs due to the immediate restoration of normal blood flow to previously markedly compressed, and under-perfused/ischemic cord tissues. On emergent postoperative MR scans, the classical findings for RPI/ WCS include new or expanded, and focal or diffuse intramedullary hyperintense cord signals consistent with edema/ischemia, swelling, and/or intrinsic hematoma. To confirm RPI/WCS, MR studies must exclude extrinsic cord pathology (e.g. extramedullary hematomas, new/residual compressive disease, new graft/vertebral fracture etc.) that may warrant additional cervical surgery to avoid permanent neurological sequelae.
methodsIn the English literature (i.e. excluding 2 Japanese studies), 9 patients were identified with postoperative RPI/WCS following cervical surgical procedures. For 7 patients, new acute postoperative neurological deficits were appropriately attributed to MR-documented RPI/WCS syndromes (i.e. hyperintense cord signals). However, for 2 patients who neurologically worsened, MR studies demonstrated residual extrinsic disease (e.g. stenosis and OPLL) warranting additional surgery; therefore, these 2 patients did not meet the criteria for RPI/WCS.
resultsThe diagnosis of RPI/WCS is one of exclusion. It is critical to rule out residual extrinsic cord compression where secondary surgery may improve/resolve neurological deficits.
conclusionsPatients with acute postoperative neurological deficits following cervical spine surgery must undergo MR studies to rule out extrinsic cord pathology before being diagnosed with RPI/WCS. Notably, 2 of the 9 cases of RPI/WCS reported in the literature required additional surgery to address stenosis and OPLL, and therefore, did not have the RPI/WCS syndromes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.