Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33093862›Full record

ReviewObstetric medicine2020

Fetal microchimerism and implications for maternal health.

Heidi Es Fjeldstad, Guro M Johnsen, Anne Cathrine Staff

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Obstetric medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Obstetric medicine · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Role of Inflammaging on the Reproductive Function and Pregnancy.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2023
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. The Immunology of Syncytialized Trophoblast.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Heidi Es FjeldstadDivision of Obstetrics and Gyneacology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8538-3922
Guro M JohnsenDivision of Obstetrics and Gyneacology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Anne Cathrine StaffDivision of Obstetrics and Gyneacology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Oslo University Hospital · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review paper outlines the definition, pathophysiology, and potential maternal health consequences of cellular fetal microchimerism, the maternal acquisition of intact cells of fetal origin during pregnancy. Increased rates and amounts of cellular fetal microchimerism are associated with several placental syndromes, including preeclampsia and fetal growth restriction. The discovery of cellular fetal microchimerism and methods of detection are briefly outlined, and we present the mechanisms hypothesized to govern pregnancy-related and long-term maternal health effects of cellular fetal microchimerism. Specifically, we discuss the potential implications of cellular fetal microchimerism in wound healing, autoimmunity, cancer, and possibly cardiovascular disease. Cellular fetal microchimerism represents a novel area of research on maternal and transgenerational health and disease, providing exciting opportunities for developing new disease biomarkers and precision medicine with targeted prophylaxis against long-term maternal disease.

Indexed as

autoimmune diseasecancercardiovascular diseaseFetal microchimerismplacental dysfunction

Identifiers

PMID33093862
PMCPMC7543167
OpenAlexW2994397054

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.