Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33093737›Full record

ArticleBiology & philosophy2020

The zone of latent solutions and its relevance to understanding ape cultures.

Claudio Tennie, Elisa Bandini, Carel P van Schaik, Lydia M Hopper

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology & philosophy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
14.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 117 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Brokering peace in the ape (culture) wars.Evolutionary human sciences · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The growing methodological toolkit for identifying and studying social learning and culture in non-human animals.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Review
  8. The origin of great ape gestural forms.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. In search of animal normativity: a framework for studying social norms in non-human animals.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Group-level signatures in bonobo sociality.Evolutionary human sciences · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Claudio TennieDepartment for Early Prehistory and Quaternary Ecology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5302-4925
Elisa BandiniDepartment for Early Prehistory and Quaternary Ecology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Carel P van SchaikDepartment of Anthropology and Anthropological Museum, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Lydia M HopperLester E. Fisher Center for the Study and Conservation of Apes, Lincoln Park Zoo, Chicago, IL USA.
University of Tübingen · DELincoln Park Zoo · USUniversity of Zurich · CH

Funding

European Research Council 714658
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The zone of latent solutions (ZLS) hypothesis provides an alternative approach to explaining cultural patterns in primates and many other animals. According to the ZLS hypothesis, non-human great ape (henceforth: ape) cultures consist largely or solely of latent solutions. The current competing (and predominant) hypothesis for ape culture argues instead that at least some of their behavioural or artefact forms are copied through specific social learning mechanisms ("copying social learning hypothesis") and that their forms may depend on copying (copying-dependent forms). In contrast, the ape ZLS hypothesis does not require these forms to be copied. Instead, it suggests that several (non-form-copying) social learning mechanisms help determine the frequency (but typically not the form) of these behaviours and artefacts within connected individuals. The ZLS hypothesis thus suggests that increases and stabilisations of a particular behaviour's or artefact's frequency can derive from socially-mediated (cued) form reinnovations. Therefore, and while genes and ecology play important roles as well, according to the ape ZLS hypothesis, apes typically acquire the forms of their behaviours and artefacts individually, but are usually socially induced to do so (provided sufficient opportunity, necessity, motivation and timing). The ZLS approach is often criticized-perhaps also because it challenges the current null hypothesis, which instead assumes a requirement of form-copying social learning mechanisms to explain many ape behavioural (and/or artefact) forms. However, as the ZLS hypothesis is a new approach, with less accumulated literature compared to the current null hypothesis, some confusion is to be expected. Here, we clarify the ZLS approach-also in relation to other competing hypotheses-and address misconceptions and objections. We believe that these clarifications will provide researchers with a coherent theoretical approach and an experimental methodology to examine the necessity of form-copying variants of social learning in apes, humans and other species.

Indexed as

Ape cultureChimpanzeeCopying-dependent formsCopying social learningImitationIndividual learningSocially mediated reinnovationsZone of latent solutions

Identifiers

PMID33093737
PMCPMC7548278
OpenAlexW3092221452

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.